Literature DB >> 10397206

Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients.

P Eggimann1, P Francioli, J Bille, R Schneider, M M Wu, G Chapuis, R Chiolero, A Pannatier, J Schilling, S Geroulanos, M P Glauser, T Calandra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous fluconazole for the prevention of intra-abdominal Candida infections in high-risk surgical patients.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals in Switzerland. PATIENTS: Forty-nine surgical patients with recurrent gastrointestinal perforations or anastomotic leakages.
INTERVENTIONS: Prophylaxis with intravenous fluconazole (400 mg per day) or placebo continued until resolution of the underlying surgical condition.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated daily, and specimens for culture were obtained three times per week during prophylaxis. The primary study end points were the frequency of and the time to intra-abdominal Candida infections. Secondary end points were the frequency of candidiasis (intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal) and the emergence or persistence of Candida colonization. Among patients who were not colonized at study entry, Candida was isolated from surveillance cultures during prophylaxis in 15% of the patients in the fluconazole group and in 62% of the patients in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.96; p = .04). Candida peritonitis occurred in one of 23 patients (4%) who received fluconazole and in seven of 20 patients (35%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.93; p = .02). In addition, one catheter-related Candida albicans sepsis occurred in a fluconazole-treated patient. Thus, overall, candidiasis developed in two fluconazole patients and seven placebo patients (relative risk, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 1.06; p = .06). C. albicans accounted for 87% of the Candida species isolated before or during prophylaxis, and all C. albicans strains were susceptible to fluconazole. Fluconazole was well tolerated, and adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in both treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents colonization and invasive intra-abdominal Candida infections in high-risk surgical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10397206     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199906000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  85 in total

1.  Response to van Saene et al.'s comment on "Prevention of severe Candida infections in non-neutropenic, high-risk, critically ill patients".

Authors:  Thierry Calandra; Oscar Marchetti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Prophylaxis and treatment of invasive candidiasis in the intensive care setting.

Authors:  L Ostrosky-Zeichner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Candida peritonitis: an update on the latest research and treatments.

Authors:  Herman Anthony Carneiro; Anastasios Mavrakis; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Oral nystatin as antifungal prophylaxis in critically ill patients: an old SDD tool to be renewed?

Authors:  Philippe Eggimann; Michel Wolff; Jorge Garbino
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Caspofungin for prevention of intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Laurence Senn; Philippe Eggimann; Riadh Ksontini; Andres Pascual; Nicolas Demartines; Jacques Bille; Thierry Calandra; Oscar Marchetti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Critical issues in the clinical management of complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Stijn Blot; Jan J De Waele
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Invasive candidiasis in pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Sunit Singhi; Akash Deep
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not require decontamination of the stomach in humans.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Lynn C Happel; Kevin Volt; Simon Bergman; Jason C Roland; Rebecca Dettorre; David B Renton; Kevin M Reavis; Bradley J Needleman; Dean J Mikami; E Christopher Ellison; W Scott Melvin; Jeffrey W Hazey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Candida colonization index and subsequent infection in critically ill surgical patients: 20 years later.

Authors:  Philippe Eggimann; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.