Literature DB >> 10396847

Artefact cancellation in motor-sensory evoked potentials: two approaches using adaptive filtration and exponential approximation.

I Dotsinsky1, A Dos Santos, I Tashev.   

Abstract

Adaptive filtering for artefact cancellation in motor-sensory evoked potentials using signals obtained by subtraction methods (double-stimulus, off-nerve and subthreshold) is proposed. This is advantageous as inherent non-linear distortions can be overcome in an easier way by adaptive filtering. Efficiency is assessed with reference signals synthesised by varying the shape and reducing the amplitude of a 'pure' evoked potential in the range from 10% to 50%. The experiments show virtually identical shapes of the 'pure' and the filtered signal. The time shift between them is insignificant if a causal filter and small number of Widrow coefficients, e.g. N = 8, are used. Further, two-exponential artefact approximation is applied with subsequent direct subtraction from the contaminated signal by a specially designed PC-controlled system for data acquisition and processing. For a fast procedure convergence, one-parametric optimisation of the time-constant tau is used, starting with tau = 0.5 ms. The results obtained with artefact-corrupted evoked potentials from several subjects prove the efficiency of the approach. It has the substantial advantage of avoiding the need for reference signals. Both methods have advantages compared with other known software techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10396847     DOI: 10.1007/bf02513271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  11 in total

1.  A digital technique for stimulus artifact reduction.

Authors:  T Blogg; W D Reid
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-12

2.  Convergence characteristics of two algorithms in non-linear stimulus artefact cancellation for electrically evoked potential enhancement.

Authors:  V Parsa; P Parker; R Scott
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials.

Authors:  D Stashuk; G M Paoli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Skin resistance during square-wave electrical pulses of 1 to 10 mA.

Authors:  A van Boxtel
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Adaptive stimulus artifact reduction in noncortical somatosensory evoked potential studies.

Authors:  V Parsa; P A Parker; R N Scott
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Adaptive method for cancellation of respiratory artefact in electrogastric measurements.

Authors:  J Chen; J Vandewalle; W Sansen; G Vantrappen; J Janssens
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Suppression of simulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recordings.

Authors:  M Knaflitz; R Merletti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Stimulus artifact compensation using biphasic stimulation.

Authors:  J Nilsson; J Ravits; M Hallett
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Stimulus artefact suppressor for EMG recording during FES by a constant-current stimulator.

Authors:  J Minzly; J Mizrahi; N Hakim; A Liberson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  On the nature and elimination of stimulus artifact in nerve signals evoked and recorded using surface electrodes.

Authors:  K C McGill; K L Cummins; L J Dorfman; B B Berlizot; K Leutkemeyer; D G Nishimura; B Widrow
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.