Literature DB >> 10396281

Frequency of problems during clinical molecular-genetic testing.

W T Hofgärtner1, J F Tait.   

Abstract

Concerns have been raised about the quality of DNA-based genetic testing, but few data are available on the problems that occur during clinical genetic testing. We sought to determine the frequency and severity of such problems in US laboratories. Problems were defined as events that could or did impair patient care significantly. Data on the frequency and severity of adverse events during genetic testing were collected from laboratories by anonymous mail questionnaire and detailed on-site inspection. The surveyed laboratories (n = 42) reported significant problems in 0.33% of tests performed; the corresponding value in the inspected laboratories (n = 2) was 0.38%. Sixty percent of problems occurred in the pretest phase, 32% in the laboratory phase, and 8% in the posttest phase or multiple phases. The average level of actual harm resulting from these problems was low. Moderate or high levels of harm occurred in only 0.008% of total cases. No lawsuits, judgments, or disciplinary actions were taken against the laboratories in 277,000 tests performed. The overall frequency of problems in a given laboratory did not correlate with laboratory age, test volume, accreditation status, proficiency testing performance, or institution type (academic, private nonprofit, private for profit). In conclusion, significant problems during genetic testing occur infrequently (< 0.5% in most laboratories), and problems resulting in moderate or high levels of harm to patients are rare (0.008%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10396281     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/112.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  6 in total

1.  Clinical impact associated with corrected results in clinical microbiology testing.

Authors:  Shan Yuan; Michael L Astion; Jeff Schapiro; Ajit P Limaye
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Current landscape and new paradigms of proficiency testing and external quality assessment for molecular genetics.

Authors:  Lisa V Kalman; Ira M Lubin; Shannon Barker; Desiree du Sart; Rob Elles; Wayne W Grody; Mario Pazzagli; Sue Richards; Iris Schrijver; Barbara Zehnbauer
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 3.  Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process.

Authors:  Robert Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Quality standards and samples in genetic testing.

Authors:  David Ravine; Graeme Suthers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Feasibility of using microbeads with holographic barcodes to track DNA specimens in the clinical molecular laboratory.

Authors:  Jason D Merker; Naomi O'Grady; Linda Gojenola; Mai Dao; Ross Lenta; Joanne M Yeakley; Iris Schrijver
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The Effectiveness of Clinician Education on the Adequate Completion of Laboratory Test Request Forms at a Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  I D Osegbe; O Afolabi; C P Onyenekwu
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.