PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of sonography in distinguishing between mechanical and nonmechanical causes for renal transplant dysfunction. METHODS: We reviewed all ultrasound examination reports (n = 286) for 63 consecutive patients who received 64 renal transplants. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of different degrees of hydronephrosis (mild, moderate, or severe) in detecting urinary tract obstruction; different volumes of new or increasing peritransplant fluid in detecting urine leaks; different total volumes of peritransplant fluid in predicting significant compression of the transplant; and Doppler vascular criteria for predicting arterial and venous occlusion. RESULTS: All mechanical complications were detected (100% sensitivity) with specificities of 91.9% for ureteral obstruction (criterion, moderate hydronephrosis), 83.4% for urine leaks (criterion, any new fluid or any increase), 91.4% for fluid collections that compressed the transplant (criterion, > 100 ml), and 100% for vascular occlusion (criteria, no flow for arterial occlusion; no venous flow and reversal of arterial flow during diastole for venous occlusion). CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is very useful in distinguishing between mechanical and nonmechanical causes for renal transplant dysfunction. It has high sensitivity and acceptable specificity in this setting.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of sonography in distinguishing between mechanical and nonmechanical causes for renal transplant dysfunction. METHODS: We reviewed all ultrasound examination reports (n = 286) for 63 consecutive patients who received 64 renal transplants. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of different degrees of hydronephrosis (mild, moderate, or severe) in detecting urinary tract obstruction; different volumes of new or increasing peritransplant fluid in detecting urine leaks; different total volumes of peritransplant fluid in predicting significant compression of the transplant; and Doppler vascular criteria for predicting arterial and venous occlusion. RESULTS: All mechanical complications were detected (100% sensitivity) with specificities of 91.9% for ureteral obstruction (criterion, moderate hydronephrosis), 83.4% for urine leaks (criterion, any new fluid or any increase), 91.4% for fluid collections that compressed the transplant (criterion, > 100 ml), and 100% for vascular occlusion (criteria, no flow for arterial occlusion; no venous flow and reversal of arterial flow during diastole for venous occlusion). CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is very useful in distinguishing between mechanical and nonmechanical causes for renal transplant dysfunction. It has high sensitivity and acceptable specificity in this setting.