Literature DB >> 10393188

A fork junction DNA-protein switch that controls promoter melting by the bacterial enhancer-dependent sigma factor.

Y Guo1, L Wang, J D Gralla.   

Abstract

Results of binding assays using DNA fork junction probes indicate that sigma 54 contains multiple determinants that regulate melting to allow RNA polymerase to remain in closed promoter complexes in order to respond to enhancers. Gel mobility shift studies indicate that the -12 promoter element and parts of sigma 54 act together to form a molecular switch that controls melting. The DNA sequences and the sigma 54 N-terminus help direct polymerase to the location within the -12 promoter element where melting will initiate. However, the fork junction that would lead to melting does not form, due to the action of an inhibitory DNA element. Such unregulated melting is inhibited further by the lack of availability of the single-strand binding elements, which are needed to spread opening from the junction to the transcription start site. Thus, in the absence of looping enhancer protein, proper regulation is maintained as the sigma 54 polymerase remains bound in an inactive state. These complex protein-DNA interactions allow the controls over protein recruitment and DNA melting to be separated, enhancing the diversity of accessible mechanisms of transcription regulation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10393188      PMCID: PMC1171450          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/18.13.3736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  23 in total

1.  Regulation of sigma 54-dependent transcription by core promoter sequences: role of -12 region nucleotides.

Authors:  L Wang; Y Guo; J D Gralla
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Escherichia coli promoter opening and -10 recognition: mutational analysis of sigma70.

Authors:  M S Fenton; S J Lee; J D Gralla
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Conservation of sigma-core RNA polymerase proximity relationships between the enhancer-independent and enhancer-dependent sigma classes.

Authors:  S R Wigneshweraraj; N Fujita; A Ishihama; M Buck
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Single amino acid substitution mutants of Klebsiella pneumoniae sigma(54) defective in transcription.

Authors:  M Pitt; M T Gallegos; M Buck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  The bacterial enhancer-dependent sigma(54) (sigma(N)) transcription factor.

Authors:  M Buck; M T Gallegos; D J Studholme; Y Guo; J D Gralla
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Action of prokaryotic enhancer over a distance does not require continued presence of promoter-bound sigma54 subunit.

Authors:  Vladimir Bondarenko; Ye Liu; Alexander Ninfa; Vasily M Studitsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  DNA supercoiling allows enhancer action over a large distance.

Authors:  Y Liu; V Bondarenko; A Ninfa; V M Studitsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interactions of regulated and deregulated forms of the sigma54 holoenzyme with heteroduplex promoter DNA.

Authors:  Wendy Cannon; Siva R Wigneshweraraj; Martin Buck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Correlating protein footprinting with mutational analysis in the bacterial transcription factor sigma54 (sigmaN).

Authors:  Siva R Wigneshweraraj; Paul Casaz; Martin Buck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Promoter opening by sigma(54) and sigma(70) RNA polymerases: sigma factor-directed alterations in the mechanism and tightness of control.

Authors:  Y Guo; C M Lew; J D Gralla
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.