PURPOSE: To examine 6-month clinical outcomes of patients after acquisition of a spiral computed tomography (CT) pulmonary arteriogram interpreted as negative for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive series of 143 patients who underwent spiral CT pulmonary arteriography for possible acute PE during a 19-month period. All studies were performed on a HiSpeed Scanner with use of 3-mm collimation with a pitch between 1.3 and 2.0, depending on patient size. All imaging was performed during dynamic contrast material injection at rates between 3.0 and 4.0 mL/sec, timed to peak pulmonary arterial enhancement. For the studies interpreted as negative for PE through the segmental (fourth order) pulmonary arteries, follow-up data were collected by telephone interviews with patients or surviving relatives, and by medical record reviews. RESULTS: Among 143 patients, 22 studies (15%) were positive for PE, eight (6%) were suboptimal to exclude PE to the segmental artery level, and 113 (79%) were interpreted as negative for acute PE. Among the 113 negative studies, 13 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a study population of 100 patients. Eighty-one patients were alive a minimum of 6 months after acquisition of a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram (mean, 9 months; range, 6-24 months) and were without interim diagnosis of PE. Nineteen patients died within the follow-up period after a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram (mean, 3 months; range, 0-8 months); however, in none of these cases was acute pulmonary embolus reported as the cause of death. No documented PE was identified by subsequent imaging studies or autopsy within the study population. CONCLUSION: A series of 100 patients with a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram did not experience significant morbidity and mortality as a result of pulmonary embolic disease within a 6-month follow-up period.
PURPOSE: To examine 6-month clinical outcomes of patients after acquisition of a spiral computed tomography (CT) pulmonary arteriogram interpreted as negative for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive series of 143 patients who underwent spiral CT pulmonary arteriography for possible acute PE during a 19-month period. All studies were performed on a HiSpeed Scanner with use of 3-mm collimation with a pitch between 1.3 and 2.0, depending on patient size. All imaging was performed during dynamic contrast material injection at rates between 3.0 and 4.0 mL/sec, timed to peak pulmonary arterial enhancement. For the studies interpreted as negative for PE through the segmental (fourth order) pulmonary arteries, follow-up data were collected by telephone interviews with patients or surviving relatives, and by medical record reviews. RESULTS: Among 143 patients, 22 studies (15%) were positive for PE, eight (6%) were suboptimal to exclude PE to the segmental artery level, and 113 (79%) were interpreted as negative for acute PE. Among the 113 negative studies, 13 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a study population of 100 patients. Eighty-one patients were alive a minimum of 6 months after acquisition of a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram (mean, 9 months; range, 6-24 months) and were without interim diagnosis of PE. Nineteen patients died within the follow-up period after a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram (mean, 3 months; range, 0-8 months); however, in none of these cases was acute pulmonary embolus reported as the cause of death. No documented PE was identified by subsequent imaging studies or autopsy within the study population. CONCLUSION: A series of 100 patients with a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram did not experience significant morbidity and mortality as a result of pulmonary embolic disease within a 6-month follow-up period.
Authors: Joachim E Wildberger; Andreas H Mahnken; Marco Das; Axel Küttner; Michael Lell; Rolf W Günther Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-01-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sara A Hayes; Gerald A Soff; Emily C Zabor; Chaya S Moskowitz; Corinne C Liu; Michelle S Ginsberg Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: Mark L Schiebler; Scott K Nagle; Christopher J François; Michael D Repplinger; Azita G Hamedani; Karl K Vigen; Rajkumar Yarlagadda; Thomas M Grist; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 4.813