Literature DB >> 10392886

Adult splenic injuries: treatment patterns and predictive indicators.

M N Sanders1, I Civil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the trend towards conservation in splenic trauma, the ability to identify a group of patients for whom we can safely offer conservative treatment becomes an important factor.
METHODS: Data were reviewed from the trauma register at the Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, in an attempt to isolate any predictive factors that may allow more appropriate allocation of treatment modalities in the future. Methods of treatment were determined and the success or failure of conservative management noted. Differences in the demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and computed tomographic (CT) findings were particularly sought.
RESULTS: Over a period of 111 weeks 48 patients were admitted with splenic injuries. Fifteen (31.2%) had immediate splenectomy, 27 (56.2%) were initially treated non-operatively and six (10.1%) died pre-operatively. Of the non-operative group eight (29.6%) failed this management at an average of 4.125 days into their hospital stay. No differences were found in age, mechanism, gender or ISS between the failed and successfully treated group. Using the Buntain classification of CT-graded splenic injury, 13 (87%) who had successful non-operative treatment had a grade II or III compared with six (86%) who failed this management being grade IV.
CONCLUSION: Although these results did not reach statistical significance, by coupling the trends seen together with other work, CT grading of splenic injury is a predictive indicator and does appear to have a role in the early allocation of patients to appropriate treatment plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10392886     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01594.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  7 in total

1.  Management of spleen injuries in the adult trauma population: a ten-year experience.

Authors:  Margherita Cadeddu; Anna Garnett; Khaled Al-Anezi; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Carlo Boselli; Alessia Corsi; Eriberto Farinella; Chiara Listorti; Stefano Trastulli; Claudio Renzi; Jacopo Desiderio; Alberto Santoro; Lucio Cagini; Amilcare Parisi; Adriano Redler; Giuseppe Noya; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Recent changes in the management of blunt splenic injury: effect on splenic trauma patients and hospital implications.

Authors:  S Sinha; S V V Raja; M H Lewis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis and management of traumatic splenic injuries.

Authors:  Claudia Lucia Piccolo; Margherita Trinci; Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-25

5.  Need for a national database for splenic trauma?

Authors:  J Horwood; A Maw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.951

6.  Non-operative management of splenic trauma.

Authors:  M Beuran; I Gheju; M D Venter; R C Marian; R Smarandache
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2012-03-05

7.  Octogenarians with blunt splenic injury: not all geriatrics are the same.

Authors:  Rame Bashir; Areg Grigorian; Michael Lekawa; Victor Joe; Sebastian D Schubl; Theresa L Chin; Allen Kong; Jeffry Nahmias
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-04-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.