S Bieri1, M Rouzaud, R Miralbell. 1. Radiation Oncology Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of different shielding conditions and field geometry on the scatter dose to the remaining testicle during postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Testicular dose measurements were made with LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) in 29 patients with stage I and IIA seminoma. The target volume consisted of para-aortic (PA) and para-aortic and homolateral iliac (PAI) lymph nodes in 14 and 15 patients, respectively. All patients had a scrotal shield as well as an additional block extending 7 cm inferiorly from the caudal field edge to shield the testicle from external scatter and collimator leakage. Doses with and without testicular blocks were measured for all patients. In seven patients treated exclusively to the PA region the gonadal dose was assessed according to four different shielding conditions: without any protection, with a gonadal shield alone, with the addition of an inferior field border block to the gonadal shield, and with the field border block alone. RESULTS: For patients treated with PAI fields the mean testicular doses per fraction were 3.89 cGy (S.D. +/- 1.44) and 1.48 cGy (S.D. +/- 0.51) without and with gonadal shielding, respectively (P-value < 0.001); the corresponding values for PA fields were 1.86 cGy (S.D. +/- 0.86) and 0.65 cGy (S.D. +/- 0.35). For the patients treated to the PA region and assessed according to the four different shielding conditions, the additional external block to the testicular shield did not reduce significantly the measured dose on the testis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a benefit of gonadal shielding even in seminoma patients undergoing radiotherapy limited to the para-aortic region.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of different shielding conditions and field geometry on the scatter dose to the remaining testicle during postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Testicular dose measurements were made with LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) in 29 patients with stage I and IIA seminoma. The target volume consisted of para-aortic (PA) and para-aortic and homolateral iliac (PAI) lymph nodes in 14 and 15 patients, respectively. All patients had a scrotal shield as well as an additional block extending 7 cm inferiorly from the caudal field edge to shield the testicle from external scatter and collimator leakage. Doses with and without testicular blocks were measured for all patients. In seven patients treated exclusively to the PA region the gonadal dose was assessed according to four different shielding conditions: without any protection, with a gonadal shield alone, with the addition of an inferior field border block to the gonadal shield, and with the field border block alone. RESULTS: For patients treated with PAI fields the mean testicular doses per fraction were 3.89 cGy (S.D. +/- 1.44) and 1.48 cGy (S.D. +/- 0.51) without and with gonadal shielding, respectively (P-value < 0.001); the corresponding values for PA fields were 1.86 cGy (S.D. +/- 0.86) and 0.65 cGy (S.D. +/- 0.35). For the patients treated to the PA region and assessed according to the four different shielding conditions, the additional external block to the testicular shield did not reduce significantly the measured dose on the testis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a benefit of gonadal shielding even in seminomapatients undergoing radiotherapy limited to the para-aortic region.
Authors: Charles B Simone; Kevin Kramer; William P O'Meara; Justin E Bekelman; Arnaud Belard; James McDonough; John O'Connell Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Poonam Yadav; Kevin Kozak; Ranjini Tolakanahalli; V Ramasubramanian; Bhudatt R Paliwal; James S Welsh; Yi Rong Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 1.482
Authors: Waleed F Mourad; John K Ma; Satyaseelan Packianathan; Weisi Yan; Sherif G Shaaban; Edward M Marchan; Lamiaa E Abdallah; Rei He; Paul N Mobit; Chunli Claus Yang; Srinivasan Vijayakumar Journal: In Vivo Date: 2017 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Alan E Thong; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Leanne Almario; Alexandre Ingels; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Mark L Gonzalgo Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Donatella Paoli; Francesco Pallotti; Andrea Lenzi; Francesco Lombardo Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 5.555