Literature DB >> 10392718

MyoD and Myf-5 define the specification of musculature of distinct embryonic origin.

B Kablar1, A Asakura, K Krastel, C Ying, L L May, D J Goldhamer, M A Rudnicki.   

Abstract

Mounting evidence supports the notion that Myf-5 and MyoD play unique roles in the development of epaxial (originating in the dorso-medial half of the somite, e.g. back muscles) and hypaxial (originating in the ventro-lateral half of the somite, e.g. limb and body wall muscles) musculature. To further understand how Myf-5 and MyoD genes cooperate during skeletal muscle specification, we examined and compared the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ (258/2.5lacZ and MD6.0-lacZ) transgenes in wild-type, Myf-5, and MyoD mutant embryos. We found that the delayed onset of muscle differentiation in the branchial arches, tongue, limbs, and diaphragm of MyoD-/- embryos was a consequence of a reduced ability of myogenic precursor cells to progress through their normal developmental program and not because of a defect in migration of muscle progenitor cells into these regions. We also found that myogenic precursor cells for back, intercostal, and abdominal wall musculature in Myf-54-/- embryos failed to undergo normal translocation or differentiation. By contrast, the myogenic precursors of intercostal and abdominal wall musculature in MyoD-/- embryos underwent normal translocation but failed to undergo timely differentiation. In conclusion, these observations strongly support the hypothesis that Myf-5 plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising after translocation of epithelial dermamyotome cells along the medial edge of the somite to the subjacent myotome (e.g., back or epaxial muscle) and that MyoD plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising from migratory precursor cells (e.g., limb and branchial arch muscles, tongue, and diaphragm). In addition, the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ transgenes in the intercostal and abdominal wall muscles of Myf-5-/- and MyoD-/- embryos suggests that appropriate development of these muscles is dependent on both genes and, therefore, these muscles have a dual embryonic origin (epaxial and hypaxial).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10392718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 0829-8211            Impact factor:   3.626


  18 in total

1.  Molecular distinction between specification and differentiation in the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family.

Authors:  D A Bergstrom; S J Tapscott
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Distinct growth hormone receptor signaling modes regulate skeletal muscle development and insulin sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  Mahendra D Mavalli; Douglas J DiGirolamo; Yong Fan; Ryan C Riddle; Kenneth S Campbell; Thomas van Groen; Stuart J Frank; Mark A Sperling; Karyn A Esser; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas L Clemens
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Snail regulates MyoD binding-site occupancy to direct enhancer switching and differentiation-specific transcription in myogenesis.

Authors:  Vahab D Soleimani; Hang Yin; Arezu Jahani-Asl; Hong Ming; Christel E M Kockx; Wilfred F J van Ijcken; Frank Grosveld; Michael A Rudnicki
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Differential requirements for myogenic regulatory factors distinguish medial and lateral somitic, cranial and fin muscle fibre populations.

Authors:  Yaniv Hinits; Daniel P S Osborn; Simon M Hughes
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  Transcriptional networks controlling stromal cell differentiation.

Authors:  Alexander Rauch; Susanne Mandrup
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche.

Authors:  Hang Yin; Feodor Price; Michael A Rudnicki
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 7.  Myogenic regulatory factors: The orchestrators of myogenesis after 30 years of discovery.

Authors:  Hasan A Asfour; Mohammed Z Allouh; Raed S Said
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2018-01-07

8.  Activin receptor type 2A (ACVR2A) functions directly in osteoblasts as a negative regulator of bone mass.

Authors:  Brian C Goh; Vandana Singhal; Angelica J Herrera; Ryan E Tomlinson; Soohyun Kim; Marie-Claude Faugere; Emily L Germain-Lee; Thomas L Clemens; Se-Jin Lee; Douglas J DiGirolamo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Myod and H19-Igf2 locus interactions are required for diaphragm formation in the mouse.

Authors:  Maud Borensztein; Paul Monnier; Franck Court; Yann Louault; Marie-Anne Ripoche; Laurent Tiret; Zizhen Yao; Stephen J Tapscott; Thierry Forné; Didier Montarras; Luisa Dandolo
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  SMYD1, the myogenic activator, is a direct target of serum response factor and myogenin.

Authors:  Dali Li; Zhiyv Niu; Weishi Yu; Yu Qian; Qian Wang; Qiang Li; Zhengfang Yi; Jian Luo; Xiushan Wu; Yuequn Wang; Robert J Schwartz; Mingyao Liu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.