Literature DB >> 10392605

Proxy respondents and the reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Empowerment factor.

R J Stancliffe1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have questioned the reliability of Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q) Empowerment scores, and reported marked disagreement between consumers' self-reports and proxy data from staff informants. The present study examined agreement between consumer self-reports and proxy responses from community living staff for 63 adults with intellectual disability. Substantial positive correlations between consumers and staff were evident No significant difference was found between total QOL-Q Empowerment scores for self- or staff reports. It was concluded that the QOL-Q Empowerment factor is sufficiently reliable for use both by self-report and proxy respondents. Even so, proxy data are not a substitute for consumer self-reports and the two data sources should not be treated as being interchangeable.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10392605     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res        ISSN: 0964-2633


  5 in total

1.  Perspectives on quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities: the interpretation of discrepancies between clients and caregivers.

Authors:  C G C Janssen; C Schuengel; J Stolk
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Expanding Public Health Surveillance for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in the United States.

Authors:  Michael H Fox; Alexandra Bonardi; Gloria L Krahn
Journal:  Int Rev Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2015

3.  Effect of deinstitutionalisation on quality of life for adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mary McCarron; Richard Lombard-Vance; Esther Murphy; Peter May; Naoise Webb; Greg Sheaf; Philip McCallion; Roger Stancliffe; Charles Normand; Valerie Smith; Mary-Ann O'Donovan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Challenging behaviours: Views and preferences of people with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Ria Wolkorte; Ingrid van Houwelingen; Marieke Kroezen
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2019-06-11

5.  Is it feasible to assess self-reported quality of life in individuals who are deaf and have intellectual disabilities?

Authors:  Johannes Fellinger; Magdalena Dall; Joachim Gerich; Maria Fellinger; Katharina Schossleitner; William Joseph Barbaresi; Daniel Holzinger
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.328

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.