Literature DB >> 10392561

Biomonitoring of exposure to ethylene oxide and propylene oxide by determination of hemoglobin adducts: correlations between airborne exposure and adduct levels.

P J Boogaard1, P S Rocchi, N J van Sittert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ethylene oxide (EO) and propylene oxide (PO) are important industrial chemicals. Exposure to these directly acting mutagens may be monitored by determination of their adducts to hemoglobin (Hb). This study establishes correlations between airborne concentrations of EO and PO and their Hb adducts in petrochemical workers.
METHODS: In three different studies conducted during maintenance shutdown of petrochemical plants the external occupational exposure to EO and PO was assessed by personal air monitoring (PAM). The internal exposure to EO and PO was concomitantly assessed by determination of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)valine (HOEtVal) and N-(3-hydroxypropyl)valine (HOPrVal) in blood samples of the operators using the N-alkyl-Edman degradation method.
RESULTS: In the first study, PAM was applied once a month at random over a period of 4 months. Blood samples for Hb-adduct determination were collected at the end of this period. No significant correlation was found between PAM and Hb-adduct data. In the next two studies, PAM was applied to the operators during the entire shift on every working day during the shutdown. Blood samples were collected before and immediately after the shutdown period. Highly significant correlations were found between the increment in the concentration of HOEtVal and HOPrVal over this period and the total exposure to EO and PO, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Time-integrated exposure to EO or PO can be readily and reliably assessed by measurement of the concentration of HOEtVal or HOPrVal in a small blood sample. In workers occupationally exposed to low concentrations of EO or PO, good correlations were found between these Hb adducts and the airborne concentrations of EO and PO. These correlations allow the calculation of tentative biological exposure limits (BELs) for EO and PO. At the current Dutch occupational exposure limit (OEL) for EO (0.84 mg m(-3), 8-h TWA) the BEL is 3.2 nmol HOEtVal/g globin. At the value of 10 mg m(-3) (8-h TWA), which is currently being investigated as the new Dutch OEL for PO, the corresponding BEL is 5.3 nmol HOPrVal/g globin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10392561     DOI: 10.1007/s004200050353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  6 in total

1.  Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method To Determine Formaldehyde Hemoglobin Adducts in Humans as Biomarker for Formaldehyde Exposure.

Authors:  Min Yang; Maria Ospina; Chui Tse; Stephen Toth; Samuel P Caudill; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  The role of endogenous versus exogenous sources in the exposome of putative genotoxins and consequences for risk assessment.

Authors:  Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Arand Michael; Hermann M Bolt; Bourdoux Siméon; Hartwig Andrea; Hinrichsen Nils; Kalisch Christine; Mally Angela; Pellegrino Gloria; Ribera Daniel; Thatcher Natalie; Eisenbrand Gerhard
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 4.  Research recommendations for selected IARC-classified agents.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B Hopf; Jane C Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M DeMarini; Bruce A Fowler; Bernard D Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien M McElvenny; Hartwig Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M Ruder; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra Silverman; Martyn T Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G Stevens; Paolo Vineis; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Lauren Zeise; Vincent J Cogliano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Kinetics of ethylene and ethylene oxide in subcellular fractions of lungs and livers of male B6C3F1 mice and male fischer 344 rats and of human livers.

Authors:  Qiang Li; György András Csanády; Winfried Kessler; Dominik Klein; Helmut Pankratz; Christian Pütz; Nadine Richter; Johannes Georg Filser
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Levels of Ethylene Oxide Biomarker in an Exposed Residential Community.

Authors:  Emily Szwiec; Lee Friedman; Susan Buchanan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.