Literature DB >> 10392201

Premeatal and retromeatal cerebellopontine angle meningioma. Two distinct clinical entities.

B Schaller1, A Merlo, O Gratzl, R Probst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Meningiomas represent the second most common type of neoplasm of the cerebellopontine angle (cpa). Their relationship to critical neural or vascular structures of the cpa is variable and they present with different signs and symptoms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrosigmoid craniotomy was performed in 31 cpa-meningiomas from January 1981 to February 1997. The mean age of the 25 women (81%) and the 6 men (19%) was 53 +/- 13 years. According to their location within the posterior fossa and with special reference to the internal auditory canal (IAC), they were classified in 17 cases (55%) as retromeatal (posterior to the iac) and in 14 cases (45%) as premeatal (anterior to the iac).
RESULTS: The retromeatal group showed a significantly larger tumour size (21 +/- 15 vs 29 +/- 20 mm) and the diagnosis was made later (2.7 +/- 3.2 vs 1.1 +/- 0.9 years) compared to premeatally located meningiomas. Before the operation, a reduction of the facial nerve function (64% vs 0%) and hearing function (100% vs 25%) was present significantly more often in premeatal meningiomas. The clinical appearance of the retromeatal group was dominated by cerebellar symptoms (44% vs 0%). Both preoperative and postoperative impairment of facial nerve and auditory function prevailed in the premeatal group.
CONCLUSION: The topological classification of CPA-meningiomas according to their location anterior or posterior to the ICA is important, because the clinical presentation, the surgical strategy to be applied, and the functional outcome of critical neural structures differ between the two subtypes. Our results provide substantial evidence for the paradoxical observation that premeatal meningiomas have a significantly worse postoperative functional outcome compared to retromeatal meningiomas although premeatal meningiomas become symptomatic earlier and at smaller sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10392201     DOI: 10.1007/s007010050326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  7 in total

1.  [Neuroprotection in brain tumors. Good sense or nonsense from the pathophysiological viewpoint?].

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Petrous Face Meningiomas: Classification, Clinical Syndromes, and Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen T Magill; Jonathan W Rick; William C Chen; David A Haase; David R Raleigh; Manish K Aghi; Philip V Theodosopoulos; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 3.  Posterior petrous bone meningiomas: surgical experience in 53 patients and literature review.

Authors:  Matthieu Peyre; Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Alain Rey; Olivier Sterkers; Michel Kalamarides
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Spinal meningioma: relationship between histological subtypes and surgical outcome?

Authors:  Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  [Cerebellopontine angle surgery. Part 2: Specific remarks].

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Trigeminal neuralgia in a patient with Marfan syndrome: case report.

Authors:  Kazuki Sakakura; Hiroyoshi Akutsu; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Yosuke Masuda; Eiichi Ishikawa; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  Surgical Resectability of Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Takeo Goto; Kenji Ohata
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 1.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.