Literature DB >> 10391568

Adherence by African American men to prostate cancer education and early detection.

R E Myers1, G W Chodak, T A Wolf, D Y Burgh, G T McGrory, S M Marcus, J A Diehl, M Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to identify factors that predict adherence by African American men to prostate cancer education and early detection.
METHODS: In the spring of 1995, the authors identified 548 African American men who were patients at the University Health Services of the University of Chicago, were ages 40-70 years, and did not have a personal history of prostate cancer. Baseline telephone survey data were collected from 413 men (75%). Participants were randomly assigned to either a minimal or an enhanced intervention group. Men in the former group were mailed a letter and a reminder that invited them to a urology clinic for prostate cancer education and early detection. Men in the enhanced intervention group were sent the same correspondence and were also given print material and telephone contacts, which were tailored to each recipient.
RESULTS: Adherence was significantly higher (OR = 2.6, CI: 1.7-3.9) in the enhanced intervention group than in the minimal intervention group (51% and 29%, respectively). Men who were age 50 years or older (OR = 1.7, CI: 1.1-2.8), were married (OR = 1.8, CI: 1.2-2.9), believed that prostate cancer early detection examination should be performed in the absence of symptoms (OR = 2.3, CI: 1.3-4.0), and self-reported an intention to have an early detection examination (OR = 1.9, CI: 1.2-2.9) were also more likely to adhere.
CONCLUSIONS: A tailored behavioral intervention can influence adherence to prostate cancer early detection among African American men. Individual background and cognitive and psychosocial characteristics may also affect behavior. Future studies should assess the impact of this type of intervention on cognitive and psychologic correlates of decision-making and behavior along the continuum of prostate cancer care. [See editorial on pages 1-2, this issue.]

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10391568     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990701)86:1<88::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

Review 1.  Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Silvana Unigwe; Glyn Elwyn; Kerenza Hood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

2.  Preparing African-American men in community primary care practices to decide whether or not to have prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Constantine Daskalakis; James Cocroft; Elisabeth J S Kunkel; Ernestine Delmoor; Matthew Liberatore; Robert L Nydick; Earl R Brown; Roy N Gay; Thomas Powell; Roberta Lee Powell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Understanding preventive behaviors among mid-Western African-American men: a pilot qualitative study of prostate screening.

Authors:  Idethia Shevon Harvey; Reginald J Alston
Journal:  J Mens Health       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 0.537

4.  Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen J Lepore; Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch; Melissa Godfrey; Emma McGinty; Celia Shmukler; Ralph Ullman; Nigel Thomas; Sally Weinrich
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-12

5.  Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Sally W Vernon; Alexander J Rothman; Gregory J Norman; Ronald E Myers; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

Review 6.  Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters "in absentia".

Authors:  D Revere; P J Dunbar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Racial differences in medical mistrust among men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Benita Weathers; Ernestine Delmoor; Brandon Mahler; James Coyne; Hayley S Thompson; Thomas Ten Have; David Vaughn; S Bruce Malkowicz; David Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  Prostate cancer education in the Washington, DC, area.

Authors:  Cynthia Warrick; Anthony K Wutoh; Zakia Corria-McDow; Anthony Emekalam
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Factors influencing perceptions of breast cancer genetic counseling among women in an urban health care system.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Sharon Hensley Alford; Diandra Britton; Beth McClary; Howard S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.