Literature DB >> 10390064

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) and invasive cervical carcinoma: the yawning gap revisited and the treatment of risk.

A Herbert1, J A Smith.   

Abstract

In a 3-year study of the population of Southampton and south-west Hampshire there were 10 times as many cases of CIN III compared with invasive squamous carcinoma (700 compared with 70). The peak incidence of CIN III per 1000 screened women years was in those aged 25-29 years, which was 20 years earlier than the peak incidence of invasive cervical cancer per 1000 women years at risk. Ninety percent of CIN III was diagnosed in women under 50 years. There were 14 cases of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CGIN III), three coexisting with CIN III, all in women aged under 50 years: the gap between intraepithelial and invasive lesions was not seen for glandular neoplasia. Although referral was for at least moderate dyskaryosis in 86.8% of women with CIN III or CGIN III, most had been screened previously, either having had mild abnormalities requiring repeat cytology (39.8%) or negative cytology (34.5%). Only 12 women aged > or = 50 years had previous negative cytology: 21.4% compared with 35.6% of women aged < 50 years (P = 0.034). The results of this study suggest that the best opportunity for preventing invasive squamous cell carcinoma lies in screening women aged 20-39 years when the incidence of CIN III in the screened population is highest and before the peak incidence of invasive disease. The results also indicate the importance of repeated screening and follow up of minor cytological abnormalities in the detection of CIN III. The benefit of screening must be regarded as a treatment of risk, since it is almost certain that a high proportion of CIN III regresses or persists unchanged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10390064     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1999.00169.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  3 in total

1.  Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage.

Authors:  Ka Hyun Nam; Ja Young Kwon; Young-Han Kim; Yong-Won Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 2.  Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Arbyn; M Kyrgiou; C Simoens; A O Raifu; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-18

3.  Age and Pattern of Pap Smear Abnormalities: Implications for Cervical Cancer Control in a Developing Country.

Authors:  Adepiti Clement Akinfolarin; Ajenifuja Kayode Olusegun; Okunola Omoladun; G O Omoniyi-Esan; Uche Onwundiegu
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.