Literature DB >> 10389734

Cystic fibrosis and chromosome abnormalities associated with echogenic fetal bowel.

B M Berlin1, M E Norton, E A Sugarman, J E Tsipis, B A Allitto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cystic fibrosis mutations and chromosome abnormalities in the fetuses of a heterogeneous population of pregnant women referred for prenatal testing for echogenic fetal bowel.
METHODS: Fetal or parental samples obtained after a second-trimester sonographic finding of echogenic fetal bowel were submitted to a referral diagnostic laboratory during a 2-year period. Results of DNA testing and karyotyping on these samples were analyzed to determine the prevalence of cystic fibrosis transmembrane reductase gene mutations and chromosome abnormalities.
RESULTS: Of 244 cases tested, two fetuses were positive for two cystic fibrosis mutations. This rate (0.8% or two of 244) is 20 times higher than the general white population rate of one per 2500. In a third case, both parents were carriers but the fetus was not tested. Nine (8%) of 113 fetuses tested had one cystic fibrosis mutation. Of 106 fetuses for whom chromosome results were available, three (2.8%) fetuses had a chromosomal abnormality: two had trisomy 21 and one had Klinefelter syndrome. A fourth fetus carried a de novo, apparently balanced, 5;12 translocation.
CONCLUSION: These laboratory results are representative of a broad spectrum of clinical settings and indicate a generalized increased risk associated with this sonographic finding. Therefore, when a second-trimester sonographic diagnosis of fetal echogenic bowel is made, fetal testing for both cystic fibrosis and chromosome abnormalities is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10389734     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00286-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Impact of public health strategies on the birth prevalence of cystic fibrosis in Brittany, France.

Authors:  Virginie Scotet; Marie-Pierre Audrézet; Michel Roussey; Gilles Rault; Martine Blayau; Marc De Braekeleer; Claude Férec
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: an ultrasonographic marker for adverse fetal and neonatal outcome?

Authors:  Maria Antonietta De Oronzo
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-01

Review 3.  Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?

Authors:  Sameer Raniga; P D Desai; Hetal Parikh
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-01-11

4.  Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population-based cohort.

Authors:  Lisa Hurt; Melissa Wright; Frank Dunstan; Susan Thomas; Fiona Brook; Susan Morris; David Tucker; Marilyn Ann Wills; Colin Davies; Gareth John; David Fone; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel.

Authors:  Xiangqun Fan; Hailong Huang; Xiyao Lin; Huili Xue; Meiying Cai; Na Lin; Liangpu Xu
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-04-09

6.  The Welsh study of mothers and babies: protocol for a population-based cohort study to investigate the clinical significance of defined ultrasound findings of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Lisa Hurt; Melissa Wright; Fiona Brook; Susan Thomas; Frank Dunstan; David Fone; Gareth John; Sue Morris; David Tucker; Marilyn Ann Wills; Lyn Chitty; Colin Davies; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.