Literature DB >> 10389725

Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study.

P Härkki-Siren1, J Sjöberg, T Kurki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine recent figures on major laparoscopic complications in Finland.
METHODS: This was a nationwide record-linkage study from January 1995 through December 1996 including all Finnish hospitals performing gynecologic laparoscopies. Data files of the National Patient Insurance Association and the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register were used. Data were compared with previous results from 1990 to 1994.
RESULTS: Among 32,205 gynecologic laparoscopies, 130 major complications were noted. The total complication rate was 4.0 per 1000 procedures: 0.6 per 1000 in diagnostic laparoscopies, 0.5 per 1000 in sterilization, and 12.6 per 1000 in operative laparoscopies. Intestinal injuries were reported in 0.7 per 1000, incisional hernias in 0.3 per 1000, urinary tract injuries in 2.5 per 1000, major vascular injuries in 0.1 per 1000, and other injuries in 0.5 per 1000 gynecologic laparoscopic procedures. Seventy-five percent (88 of 118) of the major complications in operative laparoscopies occurred during hysterectomies. The total major complication rate decreased from 4.9% in 1993 to 2.3% in 1996 (chi2 = 8.55, P = .003), but the incidence of ureteral injuries remained stable, at about 1% of laparoscopic hysterectomies. Ureteral injuries were most common in local hospitals (2.6%), followed by central (1.1%) and university hospitals (0.9%). From 1990 through 1996, the relative risk for ureteral injury in laparoscopic hysterectomies, compared with other operative laparoscopies was 29.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.3, 63.0), for bladder injury 13.0 (95% CI 6.0, 28.2), for intestinal injury 1.3 (95% CI 0.6, 2.5), and for major vascular injury 0.4 (95% CI 0.1, 3.6). Compared with the figures for 1990-1994, all major complications in operative laparoscopies increased, from 0 per 1000 in 1990 to 14.0 per 1000 in 1996 (chi2 = 20.28, P<.001), but part of this increase was due to the increased proportion of laparoscopic hysterectomies.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomies are still associated with a stable 1% risk of ureteral injury, whereas other major complications were decreasing until 1996. Complications in other laparoscopic procedures generally are rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10389725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  18 in total

1.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: 10 steps toward a successful procedure.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Yoko Suzuki
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Euro-NOTES Status Paper: from the concept to clinical practice.

Authors:  K H Fuchs; A Meining; D von Renteln; G Fernandez-Esparrach; W Breithaupt; C Zornig; A Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.

Authors:  Sarah E Rutstein; Matthew T Siedhoff; Elizabeth J Geller; Kemi M Doll; Jennifer M Wu; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Transanal hybrid colon resection: from laparoscopy to NOTES.

Authors:  Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Wolfram Breithaupt; Gabor Varga; Thomas Schulz; Alexander Reinisch; Nenad Josipovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Urinary tract injury: medical negligence or unavoidable complication?

Authors:  Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  M P Milad; K Morrison; A Sokol; D Miller; L Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Risk factors for lower urinary tract injury at the time of hysterectomy for benign reasons.

Authors:  Mamta M Mamik; Danielle Antosh; Dena E White; Erinn M Myers; Melinda Abernethy; Salma Rahimi; Nina Bhatia; Clifford R Qualls; Gena Dunivan; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Role of laparohysteroscopy in women with normal pelvic imaging and failed ovulation stimulation with intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  K Jayakrishnan; Aby K Koshy; R Raju
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-01

9.  Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: prospective evaluation of medium-term results and current developments.

Authors:  Ali Serdar Gözen; Joanne Cresswell; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Suresh Ganta; Jens Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.