Literature DB >> 10389561

Incidents in obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia: an analysis of 5000 AIMS reports.

M Sinclair1, S Simmons, A Cyna.   

Abstract

We aimed to explore the first 5000 incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) involving anaesthesia for obstetric patients and found 203 such incidents. Analysis and classification identified seven main incident groups; regional anaesthetic techniques (33%), anaesthetic equipment problems (13%), "wrong drug" errors (10%), other drug-related problems (16%), difficult/failed intubation (9%), problems with the endotracheal tube (9%) and other problems (10%). When compared to the incidents in the main database, obstetric cases were found to be over-represented with respect to accidental dural puncture, post dural puncture headache, failed intubation in emergency situations and the incidence of certain types of "wrong drug" error. The implications of these reports regarding safe practice of obstetric anaesthesia are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10389561     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9902700309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Airway management].

Authors:  G Schälte; S Rex; D Henzler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [SBA 2020: Regional anesthesia safety recommendations update].

Authors:  Liana Maria Tôrres de Araújo Azi; Neuber Martins Fonseca; Livia Gurgel Linard
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.