Literature DB >> 10387542

The role of the ECHO model in outcomes research and clinical practice improvement.

M J Gunter1.   

Abstract

In the articles that follow in this Special Report supplement to The American Journal of Managed Care, the reader will note that various types of outcomes--humanistic and economic, as well as clinical--are measured to achieve a balanced picture of the comprehensive impact of the healthcare interventions implemented. Clinical research has only recently evolved to a state in which a balanced-systems approach to outcomes measurement is moving to the forefront. It is therefore important to understand the historical context of the outcomes movement within which the multidimensional approach developed. A description of this historical context is provided below, followed by an overview of the ECHO (Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes) Model and case examples of the balance-of-outcomes model as implemented in a large integrated delivery system.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10387542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  11 in total

Review 1.  Does mindfulness improve outcomes in patients with chronic pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fathima L Marikar Bawa; Stewart W Mercer; Rachel J Atherton; Fiona Clague; Andrew Keen; Neil W Scott; Christine M Bond
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of the impact of clinical pharmacy services on patient outcomes in mental health.

Authors:  Tom E Richardson; Claire L O'Reilly; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-12-04

3.  Evidence for the outcomes and impact of clinical pharmacy: context of UK hospital pharmacy practice.

Authors:  Raliat Onatade; Sandra Appiah; Martin Stephens; Hemda Garelick
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-10-30

Review 4.  Is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) cost-effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Benjamin M Craig; Opher Caspi
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 3.659

5.  Economic analysis of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine: considerations raised by an expert panel.

Authors:  Ian D Coulter; Patricia M Herman; Shanthi Nataraj
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  An analysis of the warning letters issued by the FDA to pharmaceutical manufacturers regarding misleading health outcomes claims.

Authors:  Satabdi Chatterjee; Harshali K Patel; Sujit S Sansgiry
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2012-12-31

Review 7.  Patient and public perception and experience of community pharmacy services post-discharge in the UK: a rapid review and qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah Khayyat; Philippa Walters; Cate Whittlesea; Hamde Nazar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cost effectiveness of natural health products: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Deborah A Kennedy; Jason Hart; Dugald Seely
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Are complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Beth L Poindexter; Claudia M Witt; David M Eisenberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Refill Adherence Measures and Its Association with Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brandon Chua; James Morgan; Kai Zhen Yap
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.