Literature DB >> 10386799

In vitro comparison of elongation of the anterior cruciate ligament and single- and dual-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

T B Edwards1, C A Guanche, S G Petrie, K A Thomas.   

Abstract

This study evaluated strain in the normal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and compared it to four different double-strand hamstring tendon reconstructive techniques. Seventeen fresh-frozen knees from 11 cadavers were tested. The strain in the anteromedial and posterolateral bands of the native ACL and their equivalents in four autograft techniques were measured using differential variable reluctance transducers. The anteromedial band of the intact ACL shortened from 0 degree -30 degrees of flexion, then lengthened to 120 degrees; the posterolateral band of the intact ACL shortened from 0 degree - 120 degrees of flexion. Following ACL excision, these knees underwent reconstruction with double-strand hamstring tendons with either single tibial and femoral tunnels, single tibial and dual femoral tunnels, dual tibial and single femoral tunnels, or dual tibial and dual femoral tunnels. With the exception of the dual-band, dual-tunnel technique, all of the procedures placed greater strain on the reconstructive tissues than was observed on the native ACL, after approximately 30 degrees of flexion. These results indicate that dual-band hamstring tendon reconstructions placed with single tibial and femoral tunnels do not address the complexity of the entire ACL. Rather, these procedures appear to only duplicate the effect of the anteromedial band, while perhaps overconstraining the joint as a result of its inability to reproduce the function of the posterolateral band. During rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction, therefore, only from 0 degree - 30 degrees of the graft tissues are not significantly strained. Dual tibial and femoral tunnel techniques should be evaluated further to more closely recreate knee kinematics following ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10386799     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19990601-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  5 in total

Review 1.  Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Francesco Giron; Pierluigi Cuomo; Paolo Aglietti; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Oliver S Schindler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The relationship of lateral anatomic structures to exiting guide pins during femoral tunnel preparation utilizing an accessory medial portal.

Authors:  Lutul D Farrow; Richard D Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical results of technique for double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hybrid femoral fixation and Retroscrew.

Authors:  Doo-Sup Kim; Chang-Ho Yi; Hoi-Jung Chung; Yeu-Seung Yoon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-12-01

5.  An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: single bundle versus anatomical double bundle techniques.

Authors:  Sandra Umeda Sasaki; Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque; César Augusto Martins Pereira; Guilherme Simões Gouveia; Júlio César Rodrigues Vilela; Fábio de Lima Alcarás
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.