Literature DB >> 10386418

Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study.

R Ascione1, C T Lloyd, W J Gomes, M Caputo, A J Bryan, G D Angelini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is both safe and effective. Nevertheless, the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest are associated with several adverse effects. Over the last 2 years there has been a revival of interest in performing CABG on the beating heart. In this prospective randomized study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of on and off pump coronary revascularization on myocardial function.
METHODS: Eighty patients (65 males, mean age 61+/-9.7 years) undergoing first time CABG were prospectively randomized to: (i) conventional revascularization with CPB at normothermia and cardioplegic arrest with intermittent warm blood cardioplegia (on pump) or (ii) beating heart revascularization (off pump). Troponin I (Tn I) release was serially measured as a specific marker of myocardial damage. Haemodynamic measurements as well as inotropic requirement, incidence of arrhythmia and postoperative myocardial infarction were also recorded.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, extent of disease, left ventricular function and number of grafts. There were no deaths or intraoperative myocardial infarctions in either group. Tn I release was constantly lower in the off pump group and this was significant at 1, 4, 12 and 24 h postoperatively. Furthermore, in this group there was a significantly reduced incidence of arrhythmias. Inotropic requirements were less in the off pump group but this did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that off pump coronary revascularization is a safe and effective strategy for myocardial revascularization. Myocardial injury as assessed by Tn I release is also reduced when compared with conventional coronary revascularization with CPB and cardioplegic arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10386418     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00072-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  16 in total

1.  Combined coronary artery and abdominal aortic surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  R Ascione; G Iannelli; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Peter P Th de Jaegere; Willem J L Suyker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Pump or no pump for coronary artery bypass: current best available evidence.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Inflammatory response and cardioprotection during open-heart surgery: the importance of anaesthetics.

Authors:  M-S Suleiman; K Zacharowski; G D Angelini
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Large multicenter trials: what do they achieve and what should be done in perfusion?

Authors:  Paul Myles
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-12

6.  Mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Joan Ivanov; Michael A Borger; Jack V Tu; Vivek Rao; Tirone E David
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Superior haemodynamic stability during off-pump coronary surgery with thoracic epidural anaesthesia: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chanaka Rajakaruna; Chris Rogers; Katie Pike; Hazaim Alwair; Alan Cohen; Sally Tomkins; Gianni D Angelini; Massimo Caputo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-27

8.  Off pump coronary artery bypass surgery for significant left ventricular dysfunction: safety, feasibility, and trends in methodology over time--an early experience.

Authors:  E Sharoni; H K Song; R J Peterson; R A Guyton; J D Puskas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Postoperative Functional Outcome After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Gated Myocardial SPECT: A Comparison by Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Jong Jin Lee; Won Jun Kang; Jin Chul Paeng; Dong Soo Lee; Ki-Bong Kim; June-Key Chung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-04-22

Review 10.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Christian H Møller; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.