Literature DB >> 10385830

Achieving compliance with pool fencing legislation in New Zealand: a survey of regulatory authorities.

L Morrison1, D J Chalmers, J D Langley, J C Alsop, C McBean.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the status of compliance and enforcement of New Zealand's Fencing of Swimming Pools Act (FOSP Act), 10 years after its introduction, and to identify methods for improving both compliance with the act and the process of enforcement.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all 74 authorities in New Zealand in which they were asked questions about their enforcement of the FOSP Act. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 12 authorities to supplement the data obtained in the postal survey.
RESULTS: Based on responses to the survey, it was estimated that there are over 59,000 domestic swimming pools in New Zealand, giving rates of 46 pools/1000 dwellings and 16 pools/1000 persons. The authorities reported that 44% of pools complied with the act, and a further 4% had been granted exemptions. Nineteen per cent of pools were reported to not comply with the act, and the compliance status of a further 33% was not known, or not stated by the authority. Only 9% of authorities had procedures for locating and inspecting pools, while 28% had a programme of reinspection to ensure that pools continued to comply. Pool owner resistance was considered to be the main difficulty with enforcing the act, and nearly half of the authorities believed publicity or education was needed to overcome these barriers. Fifty two per cent of authorities had publicized the act during the 12 months preceding the survey.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to ambiguities within the legislation, and differing levels of commitment by authorities to locate pools and monitor compliance, compliance with the FOSP Act is not consistent nationally. If the act were less ambiguous, there would be greater consistency and more enforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10385830      PMCID: PMC1730476          DOI: 10.1136/ip.5.2.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  25 in total

1.  Swimming pool owners' opinions of strategies for prevention of drowning.

Authors:  G J Wintemute; M A Wright
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Prevention of childhood drowning accidents.

Authors:  J Pearn; J Nixon
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1977-04-23       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Caregiver factors and pool fencing: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  K J Fisher; K P Balanda
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Accidental drownings in Auckland children.

Authors:  S D Gardiner; W M Smeeton; T D Koelmeyer; F J Cairns
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1985-07-24

5.  Fencing of private swimming pools in New Zealand.

Authors:  J Langley
Journal:  Community Health Stud       Date:  1983-10

6.  Will fenced pools save lives? A 10-year study from Mulgrave Shire, Queensland.

Authors:  N Milliner; J Pearn; R Guard
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1980-11-01       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Risks of drowning in fenced and unfenced domestic swimming pools.

Authors:  D M Fergusson; L J Horwood
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1984-11-14

8.  The safety standards of domestic swimming pools 1980-1982.

Authors:  D M Fergusson; L J Horwood; F T Shannon
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1983-02-09

9.  Domestic swimming pool accidents to pre-school children.

Authors:  D M Fergusson; L J Horwood; F T Shannon
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1983-09-28

10.  Fifteen years of child drowning--a 1967-1981 analysis of all fatal cases from the Brisbane Drowning Study and an 11 year study of consecutive near-drowning cases.

Authors:  J Nixon; J Pearn; I Wilkey; A Corcoran
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1986-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Drowning in swimming pools: clinical features and safety recommendations based on a study of descriptive records by emergency medical services attending to 995 calls.

Authors:  Joanna Shi-En Chan; Marie Xin Ru Ng; Yih Yng Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 1.858

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.