Literature DB >> 10385144

Relationships among breast cancer concern, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among African-American women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

I M Lipkus1, D Iden, J Terrenoire, J R Feaganes.   

Abstract

There has been very little research exploring the relationships among perceptions of, and concern about, getting breast cancer and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer among African-American women with and without a family history of breast cancer. This study explored these issues among 130 and 136 African-American women with and without a family history of breast cancer, respectively. Women with a family history reported having greater perceived breast cancer risks and concerns than women without a family history of breast cancer. Knowledge of breast cancer risk factors was very poor and correlated weakly with perceptions of risk and concern. In attributional analyses, acknowledging one's family history status was the strongest predictor of perceived risk only among women with a family history. Women with a family history of breast cancer expressed greater interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility than women without a family history, although interest in testing was high overall. Increasing perceptions of breast cancer risks and concerns were related to a greater interest in genetic testing, and this relationship was not moderated by family history status. Attributions of risk and knowledge of breast cancer risk factors generally were not related to interest in testing. Overall, these results suggest that: (a) African-American women with a family history are more concerned about and do recognize their greater risk of breast cancer; (b) knowledge of risk factors and attributions of risk are not directly related to interest in genetic testing; and (c) concerns, rather than beliefs about one's risk, are more powerfully related to interest in genetic testing, independent of family history status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10385144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  39 in total

1.  Perceived risk for cancer in an urban sexual minority.

Authors:  Jack E Burkhalter; Jennifer L Hay; Elliot Coups; Barbara Warren; Yuelin Li; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09-25

2.  Cultural aspects of cancer genetics: setting a research agenda.

Authors:  B Meiser; M Eisenbruch; K Barlow-Stewart; K Tucker; Z Steel; D Goldstein
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Predictors of perceived susceptibility of breast cancer and changes over time: a mixed modeling approach.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Paul R Swank; Lori A Bastian; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Correlates of family health history discussions between college students and physicians: does family cancer history make a difference?

Authors:  Matthew Lee Smith; Erica T Sosa; Angela K Hochhalter; Julie Covin; Marcia G Ory; E Lisako J McKyer
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2011-12

6.  Communication of uncertainty regarding individualized cancer risk estimates: effects and influential factors.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Tom Lehman; Bill Killam; Holly Massett; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Perceptions of African-American health professionals and community members on the participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research.

Authors:  E M Ngui; T D Warner; L W Roberts
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Timing is everything: methodologic issues locating and recruiting medically underserved women for abnormal mammography follow-up research.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann S Lin; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Predictive value of breast cancer cognitions and attitudes toward genetic testing on women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Frauke Reitz; Jürgen Barth; Jürgen Bengel
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2004-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.