Literature DB >> 10383884

The tamoxifen dilemma.

I N White1.   

Abstract

The anti-oestrogen tamoxifen is widely used for adjuvant therapy in the treatment of women with breast cancer and has a low incidence of serious side-effects. It could also play a role as a breast cancer chemopreventive agent. However, epidemiological studies in both tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients and in healthy women have shown that treatment results in a small increase in the incidence of endometrial cancers. While the use of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients is clearly justified, the situation for its use as a chemopreventive agent in healthy women is not so clear cut. Reasons for caution come from studies in rats that show that tamoxifen is a genotoxic mutagenic liver carcinogen. Initiation of tumours in the rat is the result of metabolic activation of tamoxifen by CYP enzymes to an electrophile(s) that binds irreversibly to DNA. This is not related to the oestrogen receptor status of the tissue. The extent of DNA damage, detected by 32P-post-labelling or accelerator mass spectrometry, is dependent both on the dose and the length of exposure. Studies have been carried out to see if such binding occurs in the uterine endometrium from tamoxifen-treated women. Results are presently inconclusive, but if such irreversible DNA binding occurs, it is at very low levels. Based on a mechanistic understanding of tamoxifen-induced liver carcinogenesis in the rat, it seems that in humans hepatic DNA damage will be close to the limit of detection by 32P-post-labelling and liver cancer will not be a significant carcinogenic risk. We cannot be certain of the mode of action of tamoxifen that results in the increase in endometrial cancers in treated women but it seems unlikely that this will be associated with a classical genotoxic mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10383884     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/20.7.1153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  13 in total

1.  Genotoxicity of the some selective estrogen receptor modulators: a review.

Authors:  Serkan Yilmaz; Ilknur M Gönenç; Ebru Yilmaz
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Sulfation of 4-hydroxy toremifene: individual variability, isoform specificity, and contribution to toremifene pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Vineetha Koroth Edavana; Ishwori B Dhakal; Xinfeng Yu; Suzanne Williams; Susan Kadlubar
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  Identification of compounds by high-content screening that induce cytoplasmic to nuclear localization of a fluorescent estrogen receptor α chimera and exhibit agonist or antagonist activity in vitro.

Authors:  Angie B Dull; Anuja A George; Ekaterina I Goncharova; Jason R Evans; Antony Wamiru; Laura K Cartner; Gordon L Hager; James B McMahon
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2013-09-19

4.  Development of an image analysis screen for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) ligands through measurement of nuclear translocation dynamics.

Authors:  Angie Dull; Ekaterina Goncharova; Gordon Hager; James B McMahon
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Potential anti-genotoxic effect of sodium butyrate to modulate induction of DNA damage by tamoxifen citrate in rat bone marrow cells.

Authors:  Haidan M El-Shorbagy
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Rad52 partially substitutes for the Rad51 paralog XRCC3 in maintaining chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  A Fujimori; S Tachiiri; E Sonoda; L H Thompson; P K Dhar; M Hiraoka; S Takeda; Y Zhang; M Reth; M Takata
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Anti-anxiety, cognitive, and steroid biosynthetic effects of an isoflavone-based dietary supplement are gonad and sex-dependent in rats.

Authors:  Jonathan Friedman; Cheryl Frye
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The comparison of miRNAs that respond to anti-breast cancer drugs and usnic acid for the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Demet Cansaran-Duman; Ümmügülsüm Tanman; Sevcan Yangın; Orhan Atakol
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Prediction of binding affinity for estrogen receptor alpha modulators using statistical learning approaches.

Authors:  Yonghua Wang; Yan Li; Jun Ding; Yuan Wang; Yaqing Chang
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 2.943

10.  Fish oil alters tamoxifen-modulated expression of mRNAs that encode genes related to differentiation, proliferation, metastasis, and immune response in rat mammary tumors.

Authors:  Lucas Tadeu Bidinotto; Ricardo López de Cicco; Johana Erika Vanegas; Julia Santucci-Pereira; John Patrick Vanden Heuvel; Sharlene Washington; Cesar Aliaga; Haifang Xu; Irma H Russo; Andrea Manni; Karam El-Bayoumy; Jose Russo
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.