Literature DB >> 10383666

Testing kin selection with sex allocation data in eusocial hymenoptera

.   

Abstract

Sex allocation data in eusocial Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps) provide an excellent opportunity to assess the effectiveness of kin selection, because queens and workers differ in their relatedness to females and males. The first studies on sex allocation in eusocial Hymenoptera compared population sex investment ratios across species. Female-biased investment in monogyne (= with single-queen colonies) populations of ants suggested that workers manipulate sex allocation according to their higher relatedness to females than males (relatedness asymmetry). However, several factors may confound these comparisons across species. First, variation in relatedness asymmetry is typically associated with major changes in breeding system and life history that may also affect sex allocation. Secondly, the relative cost of females and males is difficult to estimate across sexually dimorphic taxa, such as ants. Thirdly, each species in the comparison may not represent an independent data point, because of phylogenetic relationships among species. Recently, stronger evidence that workers control sex allocation has been provided by intraspecific studies of sex ratio variation across colonies. In several species of eusocial Hymenoptera, colonies with high relatedness asymmetry produced mostly females, in contrast to colonies with low relatedness asymmetry which produced mostly males. Additional signs of worker control were found by investigating proximate mechanisms of sex ratio manipulation in ants and wasps. However, worker control is not always effective, and further manipulative experiments will be needed to disentangle the multiple evolutionary factors and processes affecting sex allocation in eusocial Hymenoptera.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10383666     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  15 in total

1.  Proximate and ultimate control of sex ratios in Myrmica brevispinosa colonies.

Authors:  J M Bono; J M Herbers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Colony sex ratios vary with queen number but not relatedness asymmetry in the ant Formica exsecta.

Authors:  W D Brown; L Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Worker policing by egg eating in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla inversa.

Authors:  Patrizia D'Ettorre; Jürgen Heinze; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Male reproductive fitness and queen polyandry are linked to variation in the supergene Gp-9 in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta.

Authors:  Lucinda P Lawson; Robert K Vander Meer; Dewayne Shoemaker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  No effect of Zn-pollution on the energy content in the black garden ant.

Authors:  Irena M Grześ; Mateusz Okrutniak
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Experimental manipulation of queen number affects colony sex ratio investment in the highly polygynous ant Formica exsecta.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Ken R Helms; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Patterns of split sex ratio in ants have multiple evolutionary causes based on different within-colony conflicts.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Kinship, greenbeards, and runaway social selection in the evolution of social insect cooperation.

Authors:  Peter Nonacs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Deleterious Wolbachia in the ant Formica truncorum.

Authors:  T Wenseleers; L Sundström; J Billen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Insect societies as divided organisms: the complexities of purpose and cross-purpose.

Authors:  Joan E Strassmann; David C Queller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.