BACKGROUND: Moderate elevations of cardiac troponin (Tn) T, up to levels presumably diagnostic for minor myocardial damage, are suspected to be false positive in nearly 0.3 of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD). It is not clear whether cardiac TnI is superior to TnT in those patients, if differences between ESRD and pre-ESRD occur, and what the prognostic meaning of these troponin elevations might be. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We examined 40 chronic renaldisease patients [56.4 SD 13.9 years; 22 male, 18 female) without evidence of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for at least 28 days prior to the investigation. Cardiac status was determined by history, physical examination, ECG and echocardiography. Patients were divided into subgroups with HD (n = 20) and without HD (n = 20). Patients without HD had a mean creatinine clearance (CC) of 13.45 ml/min. Tn were measured by immunoassay techniques. TnT was compared to two different TnI tests (TnID, TnIB), CK/CKMB activity and myoglobin (MYO) concentrations. In all patients, a 9-month follow-up for acute myocardial infarction, re-hospitalization, and death was completed. RESULTS: None of the troponins significantly predicted patient outcome. Tn did not correlate with CC (r<0.6). Applying the lowest reported threshold values for all tests in the HD group, 0.3 patients were positive for TnT, 0.55 patients were positive for TnID, and 0.15 for TnIB. In the group without HD, 0.2 patients were positive for TnT and TnID and 0.1 for TnIB. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate elevations of cardiac troponins are common in clinically stable patients with renal disease and are neither diagnostic for an acute coronary syndrome nor predictive of outcome. It is concluded that increased troponins in asymptomatic renal patients are of questionable value for risk stratification, most probably due to unspecific elevations.
BACKGROUND: Moderate elevations of cardiac troponin (Tn) T, up to levels presumably diagnostic for minor myocardial damage, are suspected to be false positive in nearly 0.3 of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD). It is not clear whether cardiac TnI is superior to TnT in those patients, if differences between ESRD and pre-ESRD occur, and what the prognostic meaning of these troponin elevations might be. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We examined 40 chronic renaldisease patients [56.4 SD 13.9 years; 22 male, 18 female) without evidence of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for at least 28 days prior to the investigation. Cardiac status was determined by history, physical examination, ECG and echocardiography. Patients were divided into subgroups with HD (n = 20) and without HD (n = 20). Patients without HD had a mean creatinine clearance (CC) of 13.45 ml/min. Tn were measured by immunoassay techniques. TnT was compared to two different TnI tests (TnID, TnIB), CK/CKMB activity and myoglobin (MYO) concentrations. In all patients, a 9-month follow-up for acute myocardial infarction, re-hospitalization, and death was completed. RESULTS: None of the troponins significantly predicted patient outcome. Tn did not correlate with CC (r<0.6). Applying the lowest reported threshold values for all tests in the HD group, 0.3 patients were positive for TnT, 0.55 patients were positive for TnID, and 0.15 for TnIB. In the group without HD, 0.2 patients were positive for TnT and TnID and 0.1 for TnIB. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate elevations of cardiac troponins are common in clinically stable patients with renal disease and are neither diagnostic for an acute coronary syndrome nor predictive of outcome. It is concluded that increased troponins in asymptomatic renal patients are of questionable value for risk stratification, most probably due to unspecific elevations.
Authors: R Parker Ward; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Gabriel B Grossman; Christopher L Hansen; Robert C Hendel; Todd C Kerwin; Benjamin D McCallister; Rupa Mehta; Donna M Polk; Peter L Tilkemeier; Aseem Vashist; Kim Allan Williams; David G Wolinsky; Edward P Ficaro Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Martina Montagnana; Giuseppe Lippi; Nicola Tessitore; Gian Luca Salvagno; Giovanni Targher; Matteo Gelati; Antonio Lupo; Gian Cesare Guidi Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.352
Authors: François-Pierre Mongeon; Marc Dorais; Jacques Le Lorier; Daniel Froment; Elaine Letendre; Stéphane Rinfret Journal: Open Cardiovasc Med J Date: 2009-06-24