Literature DB >> 10382776

Pedicle screw placement at the sacrum: anatomical characterization and limitations at S1.

P A Robertson1, L D Plank.   

Abstract

Anatomical and biomechanical data have suggested that pedicle screw fixation at the sacrum is optimum in the anteromedial direction into the S1 vertebral body, yet the possibility of posterior iliac crest interference with this screw pathway has been considered but not defined. This study aimed to determine if the anteromedial direction of screw placement into the vertebral body is possible in all cases at S1 and to assess the limiting effect of the posterior iliac crest. Computed tomography scans of the upper sacrum at the S1 pedicle parallel to the sacral endplate were examined in 100 patients. Analysis using a digitizer allowed characterization of an ideal screw pathway with variable screw and screw head diameters in an anteromedial direction into the S vertebral body. The effects of the posterior iliac crest upon these pathways were studied. The study demonstrated that anteromedial placement with bicortical fixation at the vertebral body was theoretically possible in almost all (98.5%) cases. Because the sacral body is often wider than the sacral spinal canal, a straight-ahead screw direction will often achieve placement into the S1 vertebral body, if the starting point for the screw allows screw placement adjacent to the medial border of the S1 pedicle with only 1.5 mm of cortical bone separating the canal and the screw. The space between the posterior iliac crest and the lateral aspect of the screw corridor ranges from a maximum of 52.4 mm to a minimum of 12.8, 6.2, and 0 mm for the 7-, 10-, and 12.5-mm screw corridors. On only three occasions (1.5%) was the ideal screw corridor not possible because of posterior iliac crest overlap. In each case, this occurred only unilaterally and when the widest of the screw corridors (12.5 mm) was used. Both the distance between the posterior iliac crests and the space available for optimum screw placement are greater in females than males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10382776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  10 in total

1.  Morphometric measurement of the lumbosacral spine for minimally invasive cortical bone trajectory implant using computed tomography.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Remi Musibau Ajiboye; Arya Nick Shamie; Qionghua Wu; Qixin Chen; Weishan Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A study of sacral anthropometry to determine S1 screw placement for spinal lumbosacral fixation in the Korean population.

Authors:  Young-Yul Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Sang-Il Kim; In-Soo Oh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Morphometry of the sacrum for clinical use.

Authors:  H Başaloğlu; M Turgut; F A Taşer; T Ceylan; H K Başaloğlu; A A Ceylan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  L5 nerve root injury caused by anterolateral malpositioning of loosened S1 pedicle screws: illustrative cases.

Authors:  Shota Tamagawa; Takatoshi Okuda; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Rei Momomura; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches.

Authors:  Xiaofei Cheng; Bin Ni; Qi Liu; Jinshui Chen; Huapeng Guan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  L5 spinal nerve injury caused by misplacement of outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Masahiro Inoue; Gen Inoue; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Hiroto Kamoda; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Miyako Suzuki; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Sumihisa Orita; Masashi Takaso; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Fixation Strength of Caudal Pedicle Screws after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with the Modified Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Method.

Authors:  Hironobu Sakaura; Toshitada Miwa; Tomoya Yamashita; Yusuke Kuroda; Tetsuo Ohwada
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

8.  Anatomic Parameters for Instrumentation of the Sacrum and Pelvis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Eric Chang; Shahbaaz A Sabri; Warren E Gardner; Jesse F Doty
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2018-08-02

9.  Comparative Morphometry of the Sacrum and Its Clinical Implications: A Retrospective Study of Osteometry in Dry Bones and CT Scan Images in Patients Presenting With Lumbosacral Pathologies.

Authors:  Suranjana Banik; Sudipta Mohakud; Sanjukta Sahoo; Prabhas R Tripathy; Simran Sidhu; Manisha R Gaikwad
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-16

10.  Level-based analysis of screw loosening with cortical bone trajectory screws in patients with lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Chao-Hsuan Chen; Der-Cherng Chen; Hsiang-Ming Huang; Hao-Yu Chuang; Wei-Lin Hsu; Der-Yang Cho; Han-Chung Lee; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.