Literature DB >> 10381997

Do parents want to be present during invasive procedures performed on their children in the emergency department? A survey of 400 parents.

E T Boie1, G P Moore, C Brummett, D R Nelson.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: No large study has addressed whether parents want to be present when invasive procedures are performed on their children in the emergency department. We conducted a survey to address this question.
METHODS: The study used a self-administered, written survey consisting of 5 pediatric scenarios with increasing level of procedural invasiveness. Parents in an urban, teaching hospital ED waiting area were asked to participate.
RESULTS: Of 407 persons asked to participate, 400 (98%) completed the survey. The number of parents expressing a desire to be present during a procedure performed on their child was 387 (97.5%) for venipuncture of the extremity, 375 (94.0%) for laceration repair, 341 (86.5%) for lumbar puncture, and 317 (80.9%) for endotracheal intubation. For a major resuscitation scenario, 316 (80.7%) wished to be present if their child were conscious during the resuscitation, 277 (71.4%) wanted to be present if their child were unconscious during the resuscitation, whereas 322 (83.4%) indicated a desire to be present if their child were likely to die during the resuscitation. Of the 400, 261 (65.3%) wished to be present for all 5 scenarios. Only 26 (6.5%) wanted the physician to determine parental presence in all 5 scenarios.
CONCLUSION: Most parents surveyed would want to be present when invasive procedures are performed on their children. With increasing procedural invasiveness, parental desire to be present decreased. However, most parents would want to be in attendance if their child were likely to die, and nearly all parents want to participate in the decision about their presence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10381997     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70274-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  13 in total

1.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Precious last moments: family presence during resuscitation.

Authors:  Tammie Quest
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-10-06

Review 4.  Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper.

Authors:  Simon John Walsh Oczkowski; Ian Mazzetti; Cynthia Cupido; Alison E Fox-Robichaud
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  [The presence of family members in the trauma room].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; J Stegmaier; S Buhmann; A Botzlar; P Biberthaler; S Kneissl; W Mutschler; K-G Kanz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Providing immediate neonatal care and resuscitation at birth beside the mother: clinicians' views, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Charles W Yoxall; Susan Ayers; Alexandra Sawyer; Sophia Bertullies; Margaret Thomas; Andrew D Weeks; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Innovation in immediate neonatal care: development of the Bedside Assessment, Stabilisation and Initial Cardiorespiratory Support (BASICS) trolley.

Authors:  A D Weeks; P Watt; C W Yoxall; A Gallagher; A Burleigh; S Bewley; A M Heuchan; L Duley
Journal:  BMJ Innov       Date:  2015-04

8.  Cord pilot trial - immediate versus deferred cord clamping for very preterm birth (before 32 weeks gestation): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Angela Pushpa-Rajah; Lucy Bradshaw; Jon Dorling; Gill Gyte; Eleanor J Mitchell; Jim Thornton; Lelia Duley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Providing immediate neonatal care and resuscitation at birth beside the mother: parents' views, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alexandra Sawyer; Susan Ayers; Sophia Bertullies; Margaret Thomas; Andrew D Weeks; Charles W Yoxall; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  The impact of parental accompaniment in paediatric trauma: a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) perspective.

Authors:  Alan Cowley; Neal Durge
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.