B Johnstone1, L H Schopp, J Harper, J Koscuilek. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia 65212, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship among neuropsychological variables, vocational outcomes, and vocational costs for Missouri Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (MO-DVR) clients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Clients referred for neuropsychological evaluations were followed until DVR case closure. Subjects were grouped according to the following DVR status at case closure: Successfully Employed, Services Interrupted, and No Services Provided. Spearman correlations with Bonferroni corrections were calculated to determine relationships among variables, and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to evaluate differences in DVR group status in terms of neuropsychological variables and DVR costs. SETTING: All evaluations were completed through a Midwestern university neuropsychology laboratory. PATIENTS: 110 consecutively referred DVR clients with nonacute TBI referred for neuropsychological evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute level (ie, raw/standard scores) of neuropsychological functioning and relative degree of decline in: intelligence (WAIS-R), memory (WMS-R General and Delayed Memory Indices), attention (WMS-R Attention Index), speed of processing (Trails A), and cognitive flexibility (Trails B); DVR costs at closure. RESULTS: 1) Surprisingly, the Successfully Employed group had significantly greater neuropsychological impairments; 2) Greater decline in delayed memory was associated with higher DVR costs (r = -0.30, P <.05); and 3) More indices of relative decline were significantly correlated with vocational outcomes (5/6) than were indices of absolute functioning (3/6). CONCLUSIONS: DVR is effective in providing services to individuals with the most significant neuropsychological deficits; it is important to consider both absolute level of functioning and relative decline in functioning when evaluating TBI.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship among neuropsychological variables, vocational outcomes, and vocational costs for Missouri Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (MO-DVR) clients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Clients referred for neuropsychological evaluations were followed until DVR case closure. Subjects were grouped according to the following DVR status at case closure: Successfully Employed, Services Interrupted, and No Services Provided. Spearman correlations with Bonferroni corrections were calculated to determine relationships among variables, and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to evaluate differences in DVR group status in terms of neuropsychological variables and DVR costs. SETTING: All evaluations were completed through a Midwestern university neuropsychology laboratory. PATIENTS: 110 consecutively referred DVR clients with nonacute TBI referred for neuropsychological evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute level (ie, raw/standard scores) of neuropsychological functioning and relative degree of decline in: intelligence (WAIS-R), memory (WMS-R General and Delayed Memory Indices), attention (WMS-R Attention Index), speed of processing (Trails A), and cognitive flexibility (Trails B); DVR costs at closure. RESULTS: 1) Surprisingly, the Successfully Employed group had significantly greater neuropsychological impairments; 2) Greater decline in delayed memory was associated with higher DVR costs (r = -0.30, P <.05); and 3) More indices of relative decline were significantly correlated with vocational outcomes (5/6) than were indices of absolute functioning (3/6). CONCLUSIONS: DVR is effective in providing services to individuals with the most significant neuropsychological deficits; it is important to consider both absolute level of functioning and relative decline in functioning when evaluating TBI.