Literature DB >> 10381522

Myeloma cells selected for resistance to CD95-mediated apoptosis are not cross-resistant to cytotoxic drugs: evidence for independent mechanisms of caspase activation.

T H Landowski1, K H Shain, M M Oshiro, I Buyuksal, J S Painter, W S Dalton.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that selection for resistance to the anthracenes, doxorubicin or mitoxantrone, results in coselection for resistance to CD95-mediated apoptosis (Landowski et al: Blood 89:1854, 1997). In the present study, we were interested in determining if the converse is also true; that is, does selection for CD95 resistance coselect for resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. To address this question, we used two isogenic models of CD95-resistant versus CD95-sensitive cell lines: 8226/S myeloma cells selected for resistance to CD95-mediated apoptosis; and K562 cells expressing ectopic CD95. Repeated exposure of the CD95-sensitive human myeloma cell line, 8226/S, to agonistic anti-CD95 antibody resulted in a cell line devoid of CD95 receptor surface expression and completely resistant to CD95-mediated apoptosis. Multiple clonal populations derived from the CD95-resistant cell line showed no difference in sensitivity to doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, Ara-C, or etoposide, demonstrating that cross-resistance between Fas-mediated apoptosis and drug-induced apoptosis occurs only when cytotoxic drugs are used as the selecting agent. Using the inverse approach, we transfected the CD95-negative cell line, K562, with a CD95 expression vector. Clones expressing variable levels of cell-surface CD95 were isolated by limiting dilution, and analyzed for sensitivity to CD95-mediated apoptosis and response to chemotherapeutic drugs. We show that CD95 surface expression confers sensitivity to CD95-mediated apoptosis; however, it does not alter response to chemotherapeutic drugs. Similarly, doxorubicin-induced activation of caspases 3 and 8 was identical in the CD95-sensitive and CD95-resistant cell lines in both isogenic cell systems. In addition, prior treatment with the CD95 receptor-blocking antibody, ZB4, inhibited CD95-activated apoptosis in 8226/S cells, but had no effect on doxorubicin cytotoxicity. These results show that CD95 and chemotherapeutic drugs use common apoptotic effectors, but the point of convergence in these two pathways is downstream of CD95 receptor/ligand interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10381522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  6 in total

1.  Ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs induce apoptosis in lymphocytes in the absence of Fas or FADD/MORT1 signaling. Implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  K Newton; A Strasser
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2000-01-03       Impact factor: 14.307

2.  Matrilysin [MMP-7] expression selects for cells with reduced sensitivity to apoptosis.

Authors:  B Fingleton; T Vargo-Gogola; H C Crawford; L M Matrisian
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  The effect of the Fas/FasL pathway during chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis of leukaemeic cells.

Authors:  P Zou; Z Liu; J Xiao
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  2001

4.  Erythroid differentiation sensitizes K562 leukemia cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by downregulation of c-FLIP.

Authors:  Ville Hietakangas; Minna Poukkula; Kaisa M Heiskanen; Jarkko T Karvinen; Lea Sistonen; John E Eriksson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Id1 is a common downstream target of oncogenic tyrosine kinases in leukemic cells.

Authors:  Winnie F Tam; Ting-Lei Gu; Jing Chen; Benjamin H Lee; Lars Bullinger; Stefan Fröhling; Andrew Wang; Stefano Monti; Todd R Golub; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prognostic impact of FAS/CD95/APO-1 in urothelial cancers: decreased expression of Fas is associated with disease progression.

Authors:  K Yamana; V Bilim; N Hara; T Kasahara; T Itoi; R Maruyama; T Nishiyama; K Takahashi; Y Tomita
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.