Literature DB >> 10381056

Field test of the reproducibility of automated measurements of medial tibiofemoral joint space width derived from standardized knee radiographs.

S A Mazzuca1, K D Brandt, J C Buckland-Wright, K A Buckwalter, B P Katz, J A Lynch, R J Ward, C L Emsley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the reproducibility of computerized measurements of minimum joint space width (JSW) in the medial tibiofemoral compartment in knee radiographs (semiflexed AP view) obtained from clinical radiology units.
METHODS: Technologists from 5 clinical radiology units were trained in the performance of the fluoroscopically assisted semiflexed AP knee examination. Each of 44 subjects (34 with knee osteoarthritis, OA, 10 with bilaterally normal knees) were examined within 7 days in 2 of the 5 units. The examination in each unit was repeated 1 week later. Minimum JSW was measured on digitized radiographic images with computer software that corrected for radiographic magnification.
RESULTS: Despite ongoing quality control by technologists, 11% of radiographs were flawed with respect to the protocol standard for knee rotation and 36% with respect to the standard for knee flexion. The standard error of measurement (SEm) of JSW in 174 knees that were examined twice in the same unit was 0.32 mm (SEm = 0.25 mm for the subset of 76 paired radiographs with uniformly high quality). The overall between-unit SEm was 0.45 mm. Within-unit, but not between-unit, precision was related to the technical quality of the radiographs. Precision was unrelated to subject age, sex, race, weight, and radiographic severity of knee OA.
CONCLUSION: The within-unit precision of JSW measurements from all pairs of semiflexed views (irrespective of technical quality) represented a notable improvement over that observed in radiographs with flawed knee rotation or flexion (as would be the case in conventional extended knee views). In future applications of this technique, assurance of technical quality by an independent observer should result in a level of measurement precision that will permit the design of clinical trials of disease modifying OA drugs with fewer subjects and/or shorter duration of treatment than is possible with conventional knee radiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10381056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  16 in total

Review 1.  Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L S Simon
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish Kothari; Ali Guermazi; Gabriele von Ingersleben; Yves Miaux; Martine Sieffert; Jon E Block; Randall Stevens; Charles G Peterfy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Semi-automated digital image analysis of joint space width in knee radiographs.

Authors:  J E Schmidt; K K Amrami; A Manduca; K R Kaufman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative indicators of joint space narrowing in subjects with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; B P Katz; K A Lane; K A Buckwalter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray.

Authors:  Charles Peterfy; Manish Kothari
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  OARSI-OMERACT definition of relevant radiological progression in hip/knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P Ornetti; K Brandt; M-P Hellio-Le Graverand; M Hochberg; D J Hunter; M Kloppenburg; N Lane; J-F Maillefert; S A Mazzuca; T Spector; G Utard-Wlerick; E Vignon; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Digital radiographic assessment of tibiofemoral joint space width: a variance component analysis.

Authors:  Heidi L Oksendahl; Nigel Gomez; Colleen S Thomas; Gary D Badger; Michael J Hulstyn; Paul D Fadale; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Reproducibility of joint space width and the intermargin distance measurements in patients with medial osteoarthritis of the knee in various degrees of flexion.

Authors:  Toshiaki Takahashi; Norio Yamanaka; Masahiko Ikeuchi; Haruyasu Yamamoto
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Diagnosis of osteoarthritis: imaging.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Risk factors for early radiographic changes of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Steven A Mazzuca; Kenneth D Brandt; Barry P Katz; Yan Ding; Kathleen A Lane; Kenneth A Buckwalter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.