Literature DB >> 10380246

Effect of body composition on oxygen uptake during treadmill exercise: body builders versus weight-matched men.

K J McInnis1, G J Balady.   

Abstract

Oxygen uptake (VO2) during treadmill exercise is directly related to the speed and grade, as well as the participant's body weight. To determine whether body composition also affects VO2 (ml.kg-1.min-1) during exercise, we studied 14 male body builders (M weight = 99 kg, SD = 7; M height = 180 cm, SD = 8; M body fat = 8%, SD = 3; M fat free mass = 91 kg, SD = 7) and 14 weight-matched men (M weight = 99 kg, SD = 9; M height = 179 cm, SD = 5; M body fat = 24%, SD = 5; M fat free mass = 73 kg, SD = 9). Percentage of body fat, t(13) = 8.185, p < .0001, and fat free mass, t(13) = 5.723, p < .0001, were significantly different between groups. VO2 was measured by respiratory gas analysis at rest and during three different submaximal workrates while walking on the treadmill without using the handrails for support. VO2 was significantly greater for the lean, highly muscular men at rest: 5.6 +/- 1 vs. 4.0 +/- 1 ml.kg-1.min-1, F(1, 26) = 21.185, p < .001; Stage 1: 1.7 mph/10%, 18.5 +/- 2 vs. 16.1 +/- 2 ml.kg-1.min-1, F(1, 26) = 6.002, p < .05; Stage 2: 2.5 mph/12%, 26.6 +/- 3 vs. 23.1 +/- 2 ml.kg-1.min-1, F(1, 26) = 7.991, p < .01; and Stage 3:3.4 mph/14%, 39.3 +/- 5 vs. 33.5 +/- 5 ml.kg-1.min-1, F(1, 26) = 7.682, p < .01, body builders versus weight-matched men, respectively. However, net VO2 (i.e., exercise VO2 - rest VO2) was not significantly different between the two groups at any of the matched exercise stages. The findings from this study indicate that VO2 during weight-bearing exercise performed at the same submaximal workrate is higher for male body builders compared to that measured in weight-matched men and that which is predicted by standard equations. These observed differences in exercise VO2 appear to be due to the higher resting VO2 in highly muscular participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10380246     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  5 in total

1.  Catecholamine responses to high intensity cycle ergometer exercise: body mass or body composition?

Authors:  J S Baker; D M Bailey; J Dutton; B Davies
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 2.  Assessment of aerobic exercise capacity in obesity, which expression of oxygen uptake is the best?

Authors:  Na Zhou
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-02-10

3.  The influence of increased body fat or lean body mass on aerobic performance.

Authors:  Marcin Maciejczyk; Magdalena Więcek; Jadwiga Szymura; Zbigniew Szyguła; Szczepan Wiecha; Jerzy Cempla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Anaerobic performance in obese populations: underestimation of power profiles.

Authors:  Julien S Baker; Bruce Davies; Duncan Buchan; Lon Kilgore
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2013-03

5.  Thermodilution vs estimated Fick cardiac output measurement in an elderly cohort of patients: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Karl-Patrik Kresoja; Alessandro Faragli; Dawud Abawi; Oliver Paul; Burkert Pieske; Heiner Post; Alessio Alogna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.