Literature DB >> 10380164

Comparison of particle lung doses from the fine and coarse fractions of urban PM-10 aerosols.

C Venkataraman1, A S Kao.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently revised the national ambient air quality standards to include a new PM-2.5 particulate standard. We examine the contributions of fine (PM-2.5) and coarse (PM-2.5 to -10) fraction of typical urban aerosols to particle doses in different lung airways resulting from 24-h exposure to the standard concentration of 150 microg m-3. The aerosol is assumed to have a bimodal lognormal mass distribution with mass median diameters of 0.2 and 5 microm, and geometric standard deviation of 1.7 and 57% of the mass in the fine (PM-2.5) mode. The daily mass dose from exposure to 150 microg m-3 of PM-10 in the nasopharyngeal (NPL) region is 20-51 microg day-1 (1.5% of inhaled fines) and 377-687 microg day-1 (30% of inhaled coarse), respectively, of fine and coarse mass filtered in the nose. Similar daily mass doses from fine and coarse fractions, respectively, to the tracheobronchial (TBL) region are 28-38 (1.5%) and 40-52 (4%) microg day-1 and to the pulmonary (PUL) region are 18-194 (6%) and 32-55 microg day-1 (2%). The daily number dose in the NPL region is 5-15 x 10(8) (0.06% of inhaled fines) and 5-10 x 10(6) day-1 (13% of inhaled coarse) respectively, of fine and coarse particles. Similar number doses to the TBL region are 2.2-3.1 x 10(10) (2%) and 7.1-11. 1 x 10(5) (2%) day-1 and to the PUL region are 1.6-16.7 x 10(10) (9%) and 2.9-17.0 x 10(5) (3%) day-1. The daily surface mass dose (microg cm-2 day-1) from coarse fraction particles is large in generations 3-5. The daily number dose (particles day-1) and surface number dose (particles cm-2 day-1) are higher from the fine than the coarse fraction, by about 10(3) to 10(5) times in all lung airways. Fine fraction particles result in 10,000 times greater particle number dose per macrophage than coarse fraction particles. Particle number doses do not follow trends in mass doses, are much larger from fine than coarse fraction, and must be considered in assessing PM health effects. For the assumed fine fraction ratio of 0.57, the estimated increase in protection from the new PM-2.5 standards is a 25% and 47% lower dose, respectively, at the 24-h and annual standard in comparison with the respective PM-10 standards. The mass fraction in the fine mode depends upon the local sources, will vary with different extents of control of various source types, and will influence the choice of control strategy to meet the revised standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10380164     DOI: 10.1080/089583799197221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  10 in total

1.  Differentiating the effects of fine and coarse particles on daily mortality in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Haidong Kan; Stephanie J London; Guohai Chen; Yunhui Zhang; Guixiang Song; Naiqing Zhao; Lili Jiang; Bingheng Chen
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  Interventions to reduce individual exposure of elderly individuals and children to haze: a review.

Authors:  Sini Zhang; Lingling Li; Wei Gao; Yujie Wang; Xin Yao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Small things make a big difference: particulate matter and exercise.

Authors:  Paul T Cutrufello; James M Smoliga; Kenneth W Rundell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Coarse particulate matter air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases among Medicare patients.

Authors:  Roger D Peng; Howard H Chang; Michelle L Bell; Aidan McDermott; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Access rate to the emergency department for venous thromboembolism in relationship with coarse and fine particulate matter air pollution.

Authors:  Nicola Martinelli; Domenico Girelli; Davide Cigolini; Marco Sandri; Giorgio Ricci; Giampaolo Rocca; Oliviero Olivieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Short-term effects of the particulate pollutants contained in Saharan dust on the visits of children to the emergency department due to asthmatic conditions in Guadeloupe (French Archipelago of the Caribbean).

Authors:  Gilbert Cadelis; Rachel Tourres; Jack Molinie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Physical Exercise in the Context of Air Pollution: An Emerging Research Topic.

Authors:  Yanwei You; Dizhi Wang; Jianxiu Liu; Yuquan Chen; Xindong Ma; Wenkai Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Chronic fine and coarse particulate exposure, mortality, and coronary heart disease in the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Robin C Puett; Jaime E Hart; Jeff D Yanosky; Christopher Paciorek; Joel Schwartz; Helen Suh; Frank E Speizer; Francine Laden
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Outdoor Air Pollution and Brain Structure and Function From Across Childhood to Young Adulthood: A Methodological Review of Brain MRI Studies.

Authors:  Megan M Herting; Diana Younan; Claire E Campbell; Jiu-Chiuan Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-12-06

10.  Association of particulate matter with autoimmune rheumatic diseases among adults in South Korea.

Authors:  Jun Seok Park; Seulggie Choi; Kyuwoong Kim; Jooyoung Chang; Sung Min Kim; Seong Rae Kim; Gyeongsil Lee; Joung Sik Son; Kyae Hyung Kim; Eun Young Lee; Sang Min Park
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 7.580

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.