Literature DB >> 10379283

Restoring the gingival contour by means of provisional resin crowns after single-implant treatment.

T Jemt1.   

Abstract

A consecutive group of 55 patients was treated with 63 single-implant restorations. The soft tissue was allowed to heal to either provisional resin crowns (n = 25) that were placed at the time of second-stage surgery, or to healing abutments (n = 38) before final crown insertion. An index that assessed the size of the interproximal mucosa adjacent to the single-implant restorations was used to evaluate the volume of the papillae 2 years after crown insertion. The results indicated that the use of provisional crowns may restore soft tissue contour faster than healing abutments alone, but the papillae adjacent to single-implant restorations presented similar volume in both groups after 2 years in function. Furthermore, the mean marginal bone loss at the implants was 0.9 mm after 1 year, and no differences were observed between the 2 groups. The present data focus on the need for more scientific data to evaluate different clinical procedures for optimizing esthetic results in implant dentistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10379283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Immediate-loading post extractive implants: indications, advantages and limits.

Authors:  G Mampieri; L Ottria; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-02-01

2.  Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique in the maxilla: a prospective case series evaluation at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rola Muhammed Shadid
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.246

3.  The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result.

Authors:  Young-Bum Kim; June-Sung Shim; Chong-Hyun Han; Sun-Jai Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  The peri-implant esthetics: An unforgettable entity.

Authors:  Sangeeta Dhir
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2011-04

5.  Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Riccardo D Kraus; Catharina Espuelas; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Irena Sailer; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.021

Review 6.  The influence of thin as compared to thick peri-implant soft tissues on aesthetic outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan P Bienz; Miha Pirc; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ronald E Jung; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.021

7.  Effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures: Consensus report of group 2 of the SEPA/DGI/OF workshop.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Kathrin Becker; Stefan P Bienz; Christer Dahlin; Nikos Donos; Christian Hammächer; Gerhard Iglhaut; Antonio Liñares; Alberto Ortiz-Vigón; Nerea Sanchez; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Daniel S Thoma; Cristina Valles; Dietmar Weng; José Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.021

8.  Evaluation of concordance between CAD/CAM and clinical positions of abutment shoulder against mucosal margin: an observational study.

Authors:  Jan K Pietruski; Anna Skurska; Anna Bernaczyk; Robert Milewski; Maria Julia Pietruska; Peter Gehrke; Małgorzata D Pietruska
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.