S Gladys1, B Van Meerbeek, P Lambrechts, G Vanherle. 1. BIOMAT-Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School for Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: An 18-month follow-up clinical trial of one conventional glass-ionomer (HIFI Master Palette), three resin-modified glass-ionomers (Fuji II LC, Vitremer, 3M Exp. 155) and one polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) was conducted to evaluate their clinical effectiveness in Class-V cervical lesions. In addition, the interface between dentin and two resin-modified glass-ionomers and one polyacid-modified resin composite was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS: After evaluation of the restorations immediately following placement (baseline), all patients were subjected to a strict recall schedule with controls at 6, 12 and 18 months. The clinical effectiveness was recorded in terms of retention and marginal integrity, clinical microleakage, caries recurrence, and tooth vitality. A chi 2-test (p < 0.05) was used to test for significant differences between materials. In case of restoration loss or special defects, a replica was made to examine the surface texture and restoration margins by SEM. In vitro, the interface was examined by SEM after an argon-ion-beam etching technique was used to enhance surface relief and disclose interfacial substructures. RESULTS: Retention appeared to be good for all the materials tested. Marginal discrepancies were localized at the incisal enamel and/or the cervical dentin margin, except for the polyacid-modified resin composite that showed most of the defects at the incisal enamel margin. None of the systems could guarantee margins free of microleakage for a long time. In vitro, the type of dentin pre-treatment defines to a great extent the morphology of the resultant interface between dentin and the restorative material tested. SIGNIFICANCE: In this clinical study, the retention rate of the tested materials was good and even excellent for some products. Perfect marginal adaptation deteriorated too fast. The marginal adaptation of the polyacid-modified resin composite at the enamel site would probably have been better by the use of selective enamel or total acid etching. Marginal sealing remains a problem. Future research should concentrate on improving the marginal adaptation and sealing capacities before a broader clinical use can be advocated.
OBJECTIVES: An 18-month follow-up clinical trial of one conventional glass-ionomer (HIFI Master Palette), three resin-modified glass-ionomers (Fuji II LC, Vitremer, 3M Exp. 155) and one polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) was conducted to evaluate their clinical effectiveness in Class-V cervical lesions. In addition, the interface between dentin and two resin-modified glass-ionomers and one polyacid-modified resin composite was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS: After evaluation of the restorations immediately following placement (baseline), all patients were subjected to a strict recall schedule with controls at 6, 12 and 18 months. The clinical effectiveness was recorded in terms of retention and marginal integrity, clinical microleakage, caries recurrence, and tooth vitality. A chi 2-test (p < 0.05) was used to test for significant differences between materials. In case of restoration loss or special defects, a replica was made to examine the surface texture and restoration margins by SEM. In vitro, the interface was examined by SEM after an argon-ion-beam etching technique was used to enhance surface relief and disclose interfacial substructures. RESULTS: Retention appeared to be good for all the materials tested. Marginal discrepancies were localized at the incisal enamel and/or the cervical dentin margin, except for the polyacid-modified resin composite that showed most of the defects at the incisal enamel margin. None of the systems could guarantee margins free of microleakage for a long time. In vitro, the type of dentin pre-treatment defines to a great extent the morphology of the resultant interface between dentin and the restorative material tested. SIGNIFICANCE: In this clinical study, the retention rate of the tested materials was good and even excellent for some products. Perfect marginal adaptation deteriorated too fast. The marginal adaptation of the polyacid-modified resin composite at the enamel site would probably have been better by the use of selective enamel or total acid etching. Marginal sealing remains a problem. Future research should concentrate on improving the marginal adaptation and sealing capacities before a broader clinical use can be advocated.