Literature DB >> 10379114

Analysis of 356 pterygomaxillary implants in edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage.

T J Balshi1, G J Wolfinger, S F Balshi.   

Abstract

One thousand eight hundred seventeen implants were placed in the completely edentulous maxillae of 189 patients (122 female; 67 male). The patients' mean age was 60 years (range 28 to 91 years). Three hundred fifty-six of the 1,817 implants were placed in the pterygomaxillary area, and all patients were restored with complete-arch fixed detachable prostheses. The mean number of implants per maxillary prosthesis was 9.0 (range 6 to 15). During stage II surgery and before loading, 41 pterygomaxillary implants (11.5%) were not osseointegrated and were removed. After a mean loading period of 4.68 years (range 0.06 to 9.20 years), 1 additional pterygomaxillary implant was lost. Altogether, 42 of 356 pterygomaxillary implants (11.8%) were removed. Survival rates according to implant size, bone quality, and tooth position were also recorded. This study illustrates a cumulative survival rate of 88.2% for pterygomaxillary site implant placement in edentulous maxillary arches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10379114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

Review 1.  Zygomatic implants: a critical review of the surgical techniques.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Alexsander Ribeiro Pedrosa; Antônio Luís Neto Custódio
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-01-25

2.  Pterygomaxillary implants: a graftless solution to deficient maxillary bone.

Authors:  G N Anandakrishna; Girish Rao
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-06-12

3.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Rationale for tilted implants: FEA considerations and clinical reports.

Authors:  G DE Vico; M Bonino; D Spinelli; R Schiavetti; G Sannino; A Pozzi; L Ottria
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2012-04-15

6.  Pterygoid Implant for Atrophic Posterior Maxilla.

Authors:  V R Balaji; R Lambodharan; D Manikandan; S Deenadayalan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

7.  Angulated Implants for Fabrication of Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture in the Maxilla.

Authors:  Nicholas Egbert; Swati Ahuja; Audrey Selecman; Russell Wicks
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-12

8.  Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Septa for Implant Placement.

Authors:  Eliza Dragan; Guillaume A Odri; Gabriel Melian; Danisia Haba; Raphael Olszewski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-03-21

9.  Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Posterior Maxillary Rehabilitations Supported by One Straight and One Tilted Implant: A 3-Year Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Francesco Ferrini; Paolo Capparé; Raffaele Vinci; Enrico F Gherlone; Gianpaolo Sannino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Implant Positioning in the Maxillary Sinus Septum: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Eliza Dragan; Odri A Guillaume; Danisia Haba; Raphael Olszewski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.