PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the cardiorespiratory responses during arm exercise with and without concurrent electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling in people with paraplegia. METHODS: On separate days, 10 subjects with spinal cord injuries (T5-T12) performed either arm cranking (ACE), or simultaneous arm cranking + electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling (ACE+ES-LCE) graded exercise tests. RESULTS: During submaximal, steady-state exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher VO2, (by 0.25-0.28 L x min(-1)) stroke volume (by 13 mL), and VE(BTPS) (by 9.4 L x min(-1)) compared with ACE alone. In contrast, there were no significant differences of submaximal HR, cardiac output, or power output between the exercise modes. At maximal exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher VO2 (by 0.23 L x min(-1)) compared with ACE alone, but there were no differences in power output, HR, or VE(BTPS). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that during submaximal or maximal exercise there was a greater metabolic stress elicited during ACE+ES-LCE compared with during ACE alone. The higher stroke volume observed during submaximal ACE+ES-LCE, in the absence of any difference in HR, implied a reduced venous pooling and higher cardiac volume loading during ACE+ES-LCE. These results suggest that training incorporating ACE+ES-LCE may be more effective in improving aerobic fitness in people with paraplegia than ACE alone.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the cardiorespiratory responses during arm exercise with and without concurrent electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling in people with paraplegia. METHODS: On separate days, 10 subjects with spinal cord injuries (T5-T12) performed either arm cranking (ACE), or simultaneous arm cranking + electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling (ACE+ES-LCE) graded exercise tests. RESULTS: During submaximal, steady-state exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher VO2, (by 0.25-0.28 L x min(-1)) stroke volume (by 13 mL), and VE(BTPS) (by 9.4 L x min(-1)) compared with ACE alone. In contrast, there were no significant differences of submaximal HR, cardiac output, or power output between the exercise modes. At maximal exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher VO2 (by 0.23 L x min(-1)) compared with ACE alone, but there were no differences in power output, HR, or VE(BTPS). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that during submaximal or maximal exercise there was a greater metabolic stress elicited during ACE+ES-LCE compared with during ACE alone. The higher stroke volume observed during submaximal ACE+ES-LCE, in the absence of any difference in HR, implied a reduced venous pooling and higher cardiac volume loading during ACE+ES-LCE. These results suggest that training incorporating ACE+ES-LCE may be more effective in improving aerobic fitness in people with paraplegia than ACE alone.
Authors: Therese E Johnston; Brian T Smith; Oluwabunmi Oladeji; Randal R Betz; Richard T Lauer Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Arjan J T Bakkum; Sonja de Groot; Mark Q Onderwater; Jelle de Jong; Thomas W J Janssen Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 1.985