Literature DB >> 10378606

Misconceptions about the colonic J-pouch: what the accumulating data show.

E R Dennett1, B R Parry.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Since 1986 when the colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis was first described, it has gained increasing acceptance as the operation of choice for low rectal cancer surgery. However, there still exist several misconceptions about its use, namely anastomotic complications, alterations in anorectal physiology, and functional outcome.
METHODS: All relevant articles derived from MEDLINE databases from 1986 to the present were reviewed. Emphasis was placed on reviewing the features that are claimed to make the colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis superior to a straight anastomosis. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The colonic J-pouch has a role in ultra-low rectal cancer surgery, with an apparent reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leaks and reduced bowel frequency. Continence is unchanged and defecatory difficulties can be reduced by constructing a small pouch (< or =5 cm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10378606     DOI: 10.1007/bf02236940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

Review 2.  Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Current Management and Future Directions.

Authors:  Timothy J Ridolfi; Nicholas Berger; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

3.  A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch.

Authors:  K Z'graggen; C A Maurer; S Birrer; D Giachino; B Kern; M W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Large contractions in the colonic J-pouch as a possible cause of incomplete evacuation.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Matsuoka; Tadahiko Masaki; Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis to prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hirochika Kato; Takashi Ishida; Nobuhiro Nitori; Ayu Kato; Takuya Tamura; Shunichi Imai; Takashi Oyama; Atsushi Kato; Takashi Hatori; Jumpei Nakadai; Shimpei Matsui; Masashi Tsuruta; Masaru Miyazaki; Osamu Itano
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Coloplasty Neorectum versus Straight Anastomosis in Low Rectal Cancers.

Authors:  Fazl Q Parray; Javaid A Magray; Manzoor Ahmad Dar; Nisar A Chowdri; Rauf A Wani; Natasha Thakur
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-01-30

Review 7.  Critical and Challenging Issues in the Surgical Management of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Aeris Jane D Nacion; Youn Young Park; Seung Yoon Yang; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 8.  Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  C J Brown; D S Fenech; R S McLeod
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

9.  Analysis of the clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tadao Tokoro; Kiyotaka Okuno; Jin-ichi Hida; Kazuki Ueda; Tahehito Yoshifuji; Koji Daito; Masako Takemoto; Fumiaki Sugiura
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Acupuncture for Quality of Life of Patients with Defecation Dysfunction after Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Guixing Xu; Hanzhou Lei; Yuanfang Zhou; Liuyang Huang; Hao Tian; Zhuo Zhou; Ling Zhao; Fanrong Liang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.629

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.