Literature DB >> 10377474

Is light-induced fluorescence better than the endoscopist's eye?

N E Marcon1.   

Abstract

While recognizing advanced tumours with endoscopy does not generally pose a challenge, cure rates are relatively low, depending on the size and stage of the tumour. Screening tests for cancer are advantageous for diagnosing cancers before the date after which a cure is no longer an option. Many gastrointestinal cancers are diagnosed after the date on which a cure is possible. The present article discusses some of the limitations of conventional white light endoscopy in screening and presents some of the fluorescent-based diagnostics that are being investigated as complements to white light endoscopy. Autofluorescence and fluorescence due to exogenous photosensitizers or precursors are two sources of fluorescence that are being studied. Preliminary results of current investigations are presented, and future research directions are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10377474     DOI: 10.1155/1999/406459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  1 in total

Review 1.  The classification of pericardial disease in the age of modern medicine.

Authors:  Bernhard Maisch; Arsen D Ristić
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.931

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.