Literature DB >> 10377419

Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species.

J C Avise1, G C Johns.   

Abstract

With respect to conveying useful comparative information, current biological classifications are seriously flawed because they fail to (i) standardize criteria for taxonomic ranking and (ii) equilibrate assignments of taxonomic rank across disparate kinds of organisms. In principle, these problems could be rectified by adopting a universal taxonomic yardstick based on absolute dates of the nodes in evolutionary trees. By using procedures of temporal banding described herein, a simple philosophy of biological classification is proposed that would retain a manageable number of categorical ranks yet apply them in standardized fashion to time-dated phylogenies. The phylogenetic knowledge required for a time-standardized nomenclature arguably may emerge in the foreseeable future from vast increases in multilocus DNA sequence information (coupled with continued attention to phylogeny estimation from traditional systematic data). By someday encapsulating time-dated phylogenies in a familiar yet modified hierarchical ranking scheme, a temporal-banding approach would improve the comparative information content of biological classifications.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10377419      PMCID: PMC22090          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

Review 1.  Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  M C King; A C Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  On the nature of global classification.

Authors:  M L Wheelis; O Kandler; C R Woese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phylogenetic uncertainty, molecular sequences, and the definition of taxon names.

Authors:  M S Lee
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Towards resolving the interordinal relationships of placental mammals.

Authors:  P J Waddell; N Okada; M Hasegawa
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Monophyletic origin of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences.

Authors:  A Meyer; T D Kocher; P Basasibwaki; A C Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Two empires or three?

Authors:  E Mayr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genes put mammals in age of dinosaurs.

Authors:  A Gibbons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Determining divergence times of the major kingdoms of living organisms with a protein clock.

Authors:  R F Doolittle; D F Feng; S Tsang; G Cho; E Little
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-01-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Frog perspective on the morphological difference between humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  L M Cherty; S M Case; A C Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene.

Authors:  G C Johns; J C Avise
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  The origin and age of haplochromine fishes in Lake Victoria, east Africa.

Authors:  S Nagl; H Tichy; W E Mayer; N Takezaki; N Takahata; J Klein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Are most species small? Not within species-level phylogenies.

Authors:  C David L Orme; Nick J B Isaac; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mating trials validate the use of DNA barcoding to reveal cryptic speciation of a marine bryozoan taxon.

Authors:  Africa Gómez; Peter J Wright; David H Lunt; Juan M Cancino; Gary R Carvalho; Roger N Hughes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Colloquium paper: three ambitious (and rather unorthodox) assignments for the field of biodiversity genetics.

Authors:  John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The evolutionary reality of higher taxa in mammals.

Authors:  Aelys M Humphreys; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Towards an integrated phylogenetic classification of the Tremellomycetes.

Authors:  X-Z Liu; Q-M Wang; M Göker; M Groenewald; A V Kachalkin; H T Lumbsch; A M Millanes; M Wedin; A M Yurkov; T Boekhout; F-Y Bai
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 16.097

Review 7.  Unpacking the species conundrum: philosophy, practice and a way forward.

Authors:  Kartik Shanker; S P Vijayakumar; K N Ganeshaiah
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  When species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly assigned to higher taxa? An assessment using sphingid moths.

Authors:  John James Wilson; Rodolphe Rougerie; Justin Schonfeld; Daniel H Janzen; Winnie Hallwachs; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Ian J Kitching; Jean Haxaire; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Characterization of 25 new microsatellite markers for the fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) and cross-species amplification in other cetaceans.

Authors:  Céline Tardy; Serge Planes; Jean-Luc Jung; Denis Ody; Emilie Boissin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  A genome-scale phylogeny of the kingdom Fungi.

Authors:  Yuanning Li; Jacob L Steenwyk; Ying Chang; Yan Wang; Timothy Y James; Jason E Stajich; Joseph W Spatafora; Marizeth Groenewald; Casey W Dunn; Chris Todd Hittinger; Xing-Xing Shen; Antonis Rokas
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.