Literature DB >> 10377023

Realistic expectations for patients with stent-graft treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results of a European multicentre registry.

P Cuypers1, J Buth, P L Harris, E Gevers, R Lahey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: the outcomes for patients after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are determined primarily by the endpoints of death and endoleaks, the latter representing continued risk of rupture. The data of a multicentre registry were analysed with regard to the early outcome of stent-graft procedures for AAA and the complications associated with this treatment. In addition, the results during follow-up were analysed by determining mortality and endoleak development as separate endpoints and as a combined endpoint defined as endoleak-free survival.
SETTING: 38 European institutions of Vascular Surgery collaborating in a multicentre registry project. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 899 patients with AAA underwent between May 1994 and March 1998 elective endovascular repair (818 men and 81 women; mean age 69 years). 80 (8.9%) of the patients had medical conditions that excluded them from open repair. 818 (91%) of patients had a bifurcated device, 63 (7%) had a straight tube graft, and only 18 (2%) had an aorto-uni-iliac device. Clinical examination and contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed at fixed follow-up intervals to assess increase or decrease of the maximum transverse diameter (MTD). Endoleaks observed at follow-up were discriminated into persistent endoleak and temporary endoleak. The latter is defined as single time observed endoleaks or with two or more negative imaging studies between observed endoleaks. Life-table analyses were used to calculate the rates of freedom-from-endoleak (no endoleak at any time), freedom-from-persistent endoleak (no persistent endoleak), patient survival, and persistent-endoleak-free-survival.
RESULTS: the median follow-up of this patient series was 6.2 months. The ratio between observed and expected follow-up data was 82% for the overall follow-up period. However, at 18 months of follow-up this rate was only 45%. The number of patients followed during this period was sufficient to allow statistically meaningful assessment. The MTD in patients with temporary endoleaks demonstrated a significant decrease at 6 to 12 months compared to preoperative values (mean 57 and 53 respectively, p =0.004). In patients with persistent endoleaks there was no change between the preoperative and 6-month MTD (mean 57 and 60 mm respectively). At 6 and 18 months freedom-from-endoleak was 83% and 74% and freedom-from-persistent endoleak was 93% and 90%, respectively. The 18-month cumulative patient survival was 88% and the main outcome measure, the persistent endoleak-free-survival was 79%.
CONCLUSIONS: the MTD decreases in patients with temporary endoleak, but not in patients with persistent endoleak. Therefore, the use of the rate of freedom-from-persistent endoleak, reflecting absence of persisting endoleaks to estimate the prognosis with regard to the AAA, is justified. Determining persistent endoleak-free survival appears a rational approach to provide a realistic outlook for patients with stent-grafted AAA. The observed 18-month endoleak-free survival reflects a satisfactory mid-term result. Copyright 1999 W.B. Saunders Company Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10377023     DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  8 in total

1.  Stent-graft repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  P G Kalman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Endoleak accidentally discovered in congestive heart failure patient.

Authors:  Serhat Akay; Huriye Akay; Gulsum Limon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Endoleakage after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Diagnosis, significance and treatment.

Authors:  Jafar Golzarian; David Valenti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  [Imaging of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)].

Authors:  D-A Clevert; A Horng; R Kopp; K Schick; G Meimarakis; W H Sommer; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Ultrasonography for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Maria Laura Luchetta; Rita De Florio; Francesco Cozzolino; Giovanni Casazza; Piergiorgio Duca; Basso Parente; Massimiliano Orso; Antonella Germani; Paolo Eusebi; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-09

7.  Association of miRNA-145 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Natasha Hasemaki; Nikolaos-Panagiotis Andreou; Evangelia Legaki; Athanasios Katsargyris; Maria Gazouli; Christos Klonaris
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Salvage of bilateral renal artery occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair with open splenorenal bypass.

Authors:  Samuel Jessula; Christine R Herman; Min Lee; Christopher B Lightfoot; Patrick Casey
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2017-09-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.