Literature DB >> 10376751

Quality of life after laryngectomy: are functional disabilities important?

F W Deleyiannis1, E A Weymuller, M D Coltrera, N Futran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the functional disabilities and overall quality of life (QOL) of patients successfully treated (ie, without evidence of disease at two years) for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer by a total laryngectomy.
METHODS: The University of Washington QOL questionnaire was administered to 10 patients prior to laryngectomy, at one year postlaryngectomy, and at two years postlaryngectomy.
RESULTS: Postlaryngectomy QOL scores were not significantly different from prelaryngectomy scores. In all QOL domains the severity of functional disability was not significantly correlated with its importance. Ninety percent of patients (9/10) reported that compared with one year prior to the diagnosis of cancer their general health was the same or better at two years postlaryngectomy. Seventy percent of patients (7/10) reported having a good to excellent overall QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: Though the loss of voice is disabling, the functional limitations caused by a laryngectomy do not necessarily translate into a worse overall QOL. Future research is needed to determine whether the importance of individual QOL domains changes as patients adjust to the experience of having and surviving cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10376751     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199907)21:4<319::aid-hed5>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  9 in total

Review 1.  Speech and swallowing after surgical treatment of advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Anne Marijn Kreeft; Lisette van der Molen; Frans J Hilgers; Alfons J Balm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Management of total laryngectomy patients over time: from the consultation announcing the diagnosis to long term follow-up.

Authors:  Emmanuel Babin; David Blanchard; Martin Hitier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Quality of life after treatment of laryngeal carcinoma: a single centre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J S Williamson; D Ingrams; H Jones
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Quality-of-life issues in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  E Hanna; A C Sherman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery.

Authors:  T C Biggs; L R Fraser; M J Ward; V S Sunkaraneni; P G Harries; R J Salib
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A qualitative study of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R J Moore; R M Chamberlain; F R Khuri
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Quality of life in head and neck cancers patients: predictive factors, functional and psychosocial outcome.

Authors:  E Babin; E Sigston; M Hitier; D Dehesdin; J P Marie; O Choussy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Health-related quality of life in long-term head and neck cancer survivors: a comparison with general population norms.

Authors:  E Hammerlid; C Taft
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Long-term evaluation in aesthetic rhinoplasty in an academic referral center.

Authors:  Gabriel Bijos Faidiga; Lucas Rodrigues Carenzi; Camila Carrara Yassuda; Flavia Silveira; Tassiana do Lago; Marcelo Gonçalves Junqueira Leite; Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.