Literature DB >> 10375496

The genetics of cell migration in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans development.

D J Montell1.   

Abstract

Cell migrations are found throughout the animal kingdom and are among the most dramatic and complex of cellular behaviors. Historically, the mechanics of cell migration have been studied primarily in vitro, where cells can be readily viewed and manipulated. However, genetic approaches in relatively simple model organisms are yielding additional insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying cell movements and their regulation during development. This review will focus on these simple model systems where we understand some of the signaling and receptor molecules that stimulate and guide cell movements. The chemotactic guidance factor encoded by the Caenorhabditis elegans unc-6 locus, whose mammalian homolog is Netrin, is perhaps the best known of the cell migration guidance factors. In addition, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and FGF receptors in particular, have emerged as key mediators of cell migration in vivo, confirming the importance of molecules that were initially identified and studied in cell culture. Somewhat surprisingly, screens for mutations that affect primordial germ cell migration in Drosophila have revealed that enzymes involved in lipid metabolism play a role in guiding cell migration in vivo, possibly by producing and/or degrading lipid chemoattractants or chemorepellents. Cell adhesion molecules, such as integrins, have been extensively characterized with respect to their contribution to cell migration in vitro and genetic evidence now supports a role for these receptors in certain instances in vivo as well. The role for non-muscle myosin in cell motility was controversial, but has now been demonstrated genetically, at least in some cell types. Currently the best characterized link between membrane receptor signaling and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton is that provided by the Rho family of small GTPases. Members of this family are clearly essential for the migrations of some cells; however, key questions remain concerning how chemoattractant and chemorepellent signals are integrated within the cell and transduced to the cytoskeleton to produce directed cell migration. New types of genetic screens promise to fill in some of these gaps in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10375496     DOI: 10.1242/dev.126.14.3035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  32 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of vertebrate forebrain development: how many different mechanisms?

Authors:  A C Foley; C D Stern
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Actin-dependent lamellipodia formation and microtubule-dependent tail retraction control-directed cell migration.

Authors:  C Ballestrem; B Wehrle-Haller; B Hinz; B A Imhof
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  Slit proteins, potential endogenous modulators of inflammation.

Authors:  Necat Havlioglu; Liya Yuan; Hao Tang; Jane Y Wu
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.643

Review 4.  Neuronal migration and molecular conservation with leukocyte chemotaxis.

Authors:  Yi Rao; Kit Wong; Michael Ward; Claudia Jurgensen; Jane Y Wu
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Reduced mobility of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-deficient myoblasts might contribute to dystrophic changes in the musculature of FGF2/FGF6/mdx triple-mutant mice.

Authors:  Petra Neuhaus; Svetlana Oustanina; Tomasz Loch; Marcus Krüger; Eva Bober; Rosanna Dono; Rolf Zeller; Thomas Braun
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  A functional domain of Dof that is required for fibroblast growth factor signaling.

Authors:  Robert Wilson; Alysia Battersby; Agnes Csiszar; Elisabeth Vogelsang; Maria Leptin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Cellular responses to extracellular guidance cues.

Authors:  Anastacia Berzat; Alan Hall
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  The cell ratchet: interplay between efficient protrusions and adhesion determines cell motion.

Authors:  David Caballero; Raphaël Voituriez; Daniel Riveline
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Evolutionary conservation of cell migration genes: from nematode neurons to vertebrate neural crest.

Authors:  Yun Kee; Byung Joon Hwang; Paul W Sternberg; Marianne Bronner-Fraser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  UNC-6/netrin and its receptors UNC-5 and UNC-40/DCC modulate growth cone protrusion in vivo in C. elegans.

Authors:  Adam D Norris; Erik A Lundquist
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.