Literature DB >> 10375217

Direct measurements of methane emissions from grazing and feedlot cattle.

L A Harper1, O T Denmead, J R Freney, F M Byers.   

Abstract

Methane (CH4) emissions from animals represent a significant contribution to anthropogenically produced radiatively active trace gases. Global and national CH4 budgets currently use predictive models based on emission data from laboratory experiments to estimate the magnitude of the animal source. This paper presents a method for measuring CH4 from animals under undisturbed field conditions and examines the performance of common models used to simulate field conditions. A micrometeorological mass difference technique was developed to measure CH4 production by cattle in pasture and feedlot conditions. Measurements were made continuously under field conditions, semiautomatically for several days, and the technique was virtually nonintrusive. The method permits a relatively large number of cattle to be sampled. Limitations include light winds (less than approximately 2 m/s), rapid wind direction changes, and high-precision CH4 gas concentration measurement. Methane production showed a marked periodicity, with greater emissions during periods of rumination as opposed to grazing. When the cattle were grazed on pasture, they produced .23 kg CH4 x animal(-1) x d(-1), which corresponded to the conversion of 7.7 to 8.4% of gross energy into CH4. When the same cattle were fed a highly digestible, high-grain diet, they produced .07 kg CH4 x animal(-1) x d(-1), corresponding to a conversion of only 1.9 to 2.2% of the feed energy to CH4. These measurements clearly document higher CH4 production (about four times) for cattle receiving low-quality, high-fiber diets than for cattle fed high-grain diets. The mass difference method provides a useful tool for "undisturbed" measurements on the influence of feedstuffs and nutritional management practices on CH4 production from animals and for developing improved management practice for enhanced environmental quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10375217     DOI: 10.2527/1999.7761392x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Aircraft mass budgeting to measure CO2 emissions of Rome, Italy.

Authors:  Beniamino Gioli; Maria F Carfora; Vincenzo Magliulo; Maria C Metallo; Attilio A Poli; Piero Toscano; Franco Miglietta
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Measurement and prediction of enteric methane emission.

Authors:  Veerasamy Sejian; Rattan Lal; Jeffrey Lakritz; Thaddeus Ezeji
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Investigation of the microbial metabolism of carbon dioxide and hydrogen in the kangaroo foregut by stable isotope probing.

Authors:  Scott Godwin; Alicia Kang; Lisa-Maree Gulino; Mike Manefield; Maria-Luisa Gutierrez-Zamora; Marco Kienzle; Diane Ouwerkerk; Kerri Dawson; Athol V Klieve
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 4.  Methods for Measuring and Estimating Methane Emission from Ruminants.

Authors:  Ida M L D Storm; Anne Louise F Hellwing; Nicolaj I Nielsen; Jørgen Madsen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Traditional vs modern: role of breed type in determining enteric methane emissions from cattle grazing as part of contrasting grassland-based systems.

Authors:  Mariecia D Fraser; Hannah R Fleming; Jon M Moorby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations.

Authors:  Paul Behrens; Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong; Thijs Bosker; João F D Rodrigues; Arjan de Koning; Arnold Tukker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.

Authors:  J A Basarab; K A Beauchemin; V S Baron; K H Ominski; L L Guan; S P Miller; J J Crowley
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.