Literature DB >> 10373723

Survival and treatment for colorectal cancer Medicare patients in two group/staff health maintenance organizations and the fee-for-service setting.

R M Merrill1, M L Brown, A L Potosky, G Riley, S H Taplin, W Barlow, B H Fireman.   

Abstract

The current study compares treatment use and long-term survival in colorectal cancer patients between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in two large prepaid group/staff health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and the fee-for-service (FFS) setting. The study is based on 15,352 colorectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1985 and 1992 and followed through 1995. Survival differences between the HMO and FFS cases were assessed using Cox regression. Treatment differences were evaluated using logistic regression. HMO cases had a lower overall mortality than did FFS cases but not a significantly lower colorectal cancer-specific mortality. Use of surgical resection was similar between HMO and FFS cases. However, rectal cancer cases in the HMOs were more likely to receive postsurgical radiation therapy than FFS cases. Superior overall survival in the HMOs may be the result of increased colorectal cancer screening, greater use of adjuvant therapies, and selection of healthier individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10373723     DOI: 10.1177/107755879905600204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  8 in total

1.  Variations in patterns of care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction for Medicare beneficiaries in fee-for-service and HMO settings.

Authors:  Harold S Luft
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Postsurgical disparity in survival between African Americans and Caucasians with colonic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dominik Alexander; Chakrapani Chatla; Ellen Funkhouser; Sreelatha Meleth; William E Grizzle; Upender Manne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Expected Monetary Impact of Oncotype DX Score-Concordant Systemic Breast Cancer Therapy Based on the TAILORx Trial.

Authors:  Angela Mariotto; Jinani Jayasekerea; Valentina Petkov; Clyde B Schechter; Lindsey Enewold; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Eric J Feuer; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; N Pal; E C Gonzalez; J M Ferrante; D J Van Durme; J P Krischer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Patient outcomes and evidence-based medicine in a preferred provider organization setting: a six-year evaluation of a physician pay-for-performance program.

Authors:  Amanda S Gilmore; Yingxu Zhao; Ning Kang; Kira L Ryskina; Antonio P Legorreta; Deborah A Taira; Richard S Chung
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  African-American and Caucasian disparities in colorectal cancer mortality and survival by data source: an epidemiologic review.

Authors:  Dominik D Alexander; John Waterbor; Timothy Hughes; Ellen Funkhouser; William Grizzle; Upender Manne
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.388

7.  Does Medicare Coverage Improve Cancer Detection and Mortality Outcomes?

Authors:  Rebecca M Myerson; Reginald D Tucker-Seeley; Dana P Goldman; Darius N Lakdawalla
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2020-01-12

8.  Racial disparities negatively impact outcomes in early-onset colorectal cancer independent of socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Suneel D Kamath; Nataly Torrejon; Wei Wei; Katherine Tullio; Kanika G Nair; David Liska; Smitha S Krishnamurthi; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.