Literature DB >> 10373262

Demographic consequences of incest avoidance in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker.

.   

Abstract

The avoidance of breeding with close relatives is an adaptation to inbreeding depression. Unfortunately, inbreeding depression has proved difficult to document or measure in the wild, despite being frequently observed among animals in captivity. We address this problem indirectly by determining the demographic cost of incest avoidance in the cooperatively breeding, polygynandrous acorn woodpecker, Melanerpes formicivorus, following the death or disappearance of all breeders of one sex within a group (a reproductive vacancy). Groups undergoing female vacancies that also contained female nonbreeding helpers experienced significantly lower reproductive success in each of the subsequent 3 years than those in which either no nonbreeding helpers or only male nonbreeding helpers were present, a decrease attributable to incest avoidance between the helper females and the related breeder males in the group. Using a computer simulation combined with a life-table analysis, we estimated that incest avoidance costs the population 9.2-12.1% in overall reproductive potential (measured in fledglings/female) and decreases the population rate of increase by 1.78-2.33%/year. These results suggest the presence, on average, of at least 1.2-1.8 lethal equivalents per individual, a value of the same magnitude as estimated for several other taxa, including humans. Incest avoidance may compound random demographic and environmental events and significantly facilitate the decline of threatened populations even prior to any detrimental effects of inbreeding depression per se. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10373262     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  7 in total

Review 1.  Life history and the evolution of family living in birds.

Authors:  Rita Covas; Michael Griesser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cost, risk, and avoidance of inbreeding in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Amy E Leedale; Michelle Simeoni; Stuart P Sharp; Jonathan P Green; Jon Slate; Robert F Lachlan; Elva J H Robinson; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Divorce in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits: a consequence of inbreeding avoidance?

Authors:  B J Hatchwell; A F Russell; D J Ross; M K Fowlie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Inbreeding avoidance influences the viability of reintroduced populations of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus).

Authors:  Penny A Becker; Philip S Miller; Micaela Szykman Gunther; Michael J Somers; David E Wildt; Jesús E Maldonado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Kin discrimination via odour in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose.

Authors:  J Mitchell; S Kyabulima; R Businge; M A Cant; H J Nichols
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Incestuous sisters: mate preference for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adeline Loyau; Jérémie H Cornuau; Jean Clobert; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and infidelity in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Gabriela K Hajduk; Andrew Cockburn; Nicolas Margraf; Helen L Osmond; Craig A Walling; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.694

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.