Literature DB >> 10372616

Physiologic effects of externally applied continuous negative abdominal pressure for intra-abdominal hypertension.

G Bloomfield1, B Saggi, C Blocher, H Sugerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the ability of an externally applied continuous negative abdominal pressure device (CNAP) to reverse the effects of elevated intra-abdominal pressure on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems.
METHODS: Anesthetized, ventilated swine had catheters placed for measurement of intra-abdominal (IAP), intracranial (ICP), central venous, pulmonary artery, pulmonary artery occlusion, mean arterial, peak inspiratory, inferior vena cava, and femoral vein pressures. After the animals stabilized, baseline measurements were obtained. IAP was increased by incrementally instilling an isosmotic polyethylene glycol solution into the peritoneal cavity until it was 25 mm Hg above baseline. IAP was maintained at 25 mm Hg above baseline for 2 hours. CNAP was then applied for 2 hours. All parameters were remeasured 30 minutes after each increase in IAP, at 2 hours after attaining maximum IAP, and lastly at 2 hours after abdominal decompression. Cardiac index was maintained near baseline by volume expansion.
RESULTS: Elevation of IAP to 25 mm Hg above baseline for 2 hours caused increases (p<0.05) in central venous pressure (10.3+/-0.9 to 15.2+/-1.7), inferior vena cava pressure (13.0+/-1.0 to 29.5+/-1.5), femoral vein pressure (13.5+/-0.5 to 33.3+/-1.3), ICP (10.6+/-1.5 to 21.0+/-1.5), and peak inspiratory pressure (18.3+/-0.3 to 34.2+/-1.0). The mean arterial pressure (106.3+/-3.5 to 125.8+/-3.4), pulmonary artery pressure (24.3+/-2.3 to 31.3+/-1.7), and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure rose (12.3+/-0.9 to 17.5+/-3.5), but not significantly. Cardiac index (3.3+/-0.5 to 3.4+/-0.4) remained essentially unchanged. CNAP significantly (p<0.05) decreased IAP (30.7+/-1.3 to 18.2+/-1.3), central venous pressure (15.2+/-1.7 to 12.4+/-2.1), inferior vena cava (29.5+/-1.5 to 19.2+/-1.3), and ICP (21.0+/-1.5 to 16.2+/-1.3). Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (17.5+/-3.5 to 15.0+/-3.1) and peak inspiratory pressure (34.2+/-1.0 to 29.7+/-1.1) decreased, but not significantly.
CONCLUSION: Acutely elevated IAP causes a significant increase in ICP and impaired cardiovascular and pulmonary function. Abdominal decompression remains the standard of care for abdominal compartment syndrome. However, in patients in whom an increased IAP does not require surgical decompression, the results of this study suggest that externally applied CNAP may be of value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10372616     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199906000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  8 in total

1.  Effects of continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure on cardiorespiratory function during abdominal hypertension: an experimental study.

Authors:  Franco Valenza; Manuela Irace; Massimiliano Guglielmi; Stefano Gatti; Nicola Bottino; Cecilia Tedesco; Micol Maffioletti; Patrizia Maccagni; Tommaso Fossali; Gabriele Aletti; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Does femoral venous pressure measurement correlate well with intrabladder pressure measurement? A multicenter observational trial.

Authors:  Bart L De Keulenaer; Adrian Regli; Wojciech Dabrowski; Vaxtang Kaloiani; Zsolt Bodnar; Javier Izura Cea; A Andrey Litvin; Wendy A Davis; Anne-Marie Palermo; Jan J De Waele; Manu L L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Risks and benefits of gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with severe venous stasis disease.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; L Wolfe; J M Kellum; M A Schweitzer; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Correlation between intra-abdominal and intracranial pressure in nontraumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Dries H Deeren; Hilde Dits; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open the abdomen and keep it open!

Authors:  Inneke E De Laet; Mariska Ravyts; Wesley Vidts; Jody Valk; Jan J De Waele; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  The secondary abdominal compartment syndrome: not just another post-traumatic complication.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Paul McBeth
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Intra-abdominal pressure may be decreased non-invasively by continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure (NEXAP).

Authors:  Franco Valenza; Nicola Bottino; Katia Canavesi; Alfredo Lissoni; Salvatore Alongi; Sabina Losappio; Eleonora Carlesso; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The relationship between intestinal hypoperfusion and serum d-lactate levels during experimental intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Arife Polat Duzgun; Baris Gulgez; Anil Ozmutlu; Didem Ertorul; Güler Bugdayci; Nurten Akyurek; Faruk Coskun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.487

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.