Literature DB >> 10372614

Duodenal versus gastric feeding in ventilated blunt trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial.

J B Kortbeek1, P I Haigh, C Doig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate transpyloric feeds as they have been proposed as a means of providing enteric nutrition more rapidly and minimizing morbidity in ventilated trauma patients.
METHODS: Between July of 1994 and June of 1997, 80 adult ventilated trauma patients were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of duodenal versus gastric feeds. Feeding was initiated within 72 hours of injury.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients received gastric feeds (G), and 37 patients received duodenal feeds (D). Mean age was 34.7+/-15.7 years (G) and 33.6+/-17.5 years (D); the difference in age was not significant (NS). Mean Injury Severity Score was 30.0+/-11 (G), 33.0+/-9.7 (D), NS. Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score was 18.0+/-6.0 (G) and 18.0+/-7.4 (D), NS. Thirty-four of 43 patients were men (G) and 28 of 37 patients were men (D), NS. Use of narcotics and paralytics between the two groups was not significantly different. Energy requirements were 1.4 times basal energy expenditure at 2,127+/-304 Kcal (G) and 2,089+/-274 Kcal (D), NS. Intensive care unit length of stay was a median of 7 days (range, 3-32 days) (G) and 10 days (range, 3-24 days) (D), NS. Number of days on ventilator was a median of 5 days (range, 3-15 days) (G) and 9 days (range, 2-13 days) (D), NS. Hospital length of stay was a median of 25 days (range, 9-88 days) (G) and 30 days (range, 16-47 days) (D), NS. Recorded morbidity was not significantly different. Pneumonia rates were 42% (G) and 27% (D), NS. Time to tolerate full-strength feeds for 24 consecutive hours was 43.8 hours +/-22.6 (G) and 34.3 hours +/-7.1 (D), difference significant at p = 0.02.
CONCLUSION: Length of stay and ventilator days were not significantly different. A larger trial would be required to determine differences in the rates of pneumonia <20%. Transpyloric-duodenal feeds significantly reduce the time required to achieve targeted enteric nutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10372614     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199906000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  17 in total

Review 1.  Enteral nutrition and mucosal immunity: implications for feeding strategies in surgery and trauma.

Authors:  David L Sigalet; Shannon L Mackenzie; S Morad Hameed
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  [Nutritional management of severely injured patients : Treatment between guidelines and reality].

Authors:  L Ney; T Annecke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Geoffrey J Dobb; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Inflammation and the host response to injury, a large-scale collaborative project: patient-oriented research core--standard operating procedures for clinical care VIII--Nutritional support of the trauma patient.

Authors:  Grant E O'Keefe; Marilyn Shelton; Joseph Cuschieri; Ernest E Moore; Stephen F Lowry; Brain G Harbrecht; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-12

Review 5.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  An integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials evaluating nasogastric against postpyloris (nasoduodenal and nasojejunal) feeding in critically ill patients admitted in intensive care unit.

Authors:  M S Sajid; A Harper; Q Hussain; L Forni; K K Singh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Relationship between feeding tube site and respiratory outcomes.

Authors:  Norma A Metheny; Barbara J Stewart; Stephen A McClave
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: relationship to tolerance, pneumonia risk, and successful delivery of enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Andrew Ukleja; Md Sanchez-Fermin
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-08

9.  A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients.

Authors:  Hayden White; Kellie Sosnowski; Khoa Tran; Annelli Reeves; Mark Jones
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Post-pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Sana Alkhawaja; Claudio Martin; Ronald J Butler; Femida Gwadry-Sridhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.