Literature DB >> 10372298

Chest pain after coronary interventional procedures. Incidence and pathophysiology.

A Jeremias1, S Kutscher, M Haude, D Heinen, D Baumgart, J Herrmann, R Erbel.   

Abstract

Chest pain following successful percutaneous coronary interventions is a common problem. Although the development of chest pain after coronary interventions may be of benign character, it is disturbing to patients, relatives and hospital staff. Such pain may be indicative of acute coronary artery closure, coronary artery spasm or myocardial infarction, but may also simply reflect local coronary artery trauma. The distinction between these causes of chest pain is crucial in selecting optimal care. Management of these patients may involve repeat coronary angiography and additional intervention. Commonly, repeat coronary angiography following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with chest pain demonstrates widely patent lesion sites suggesting that the pain was due to coronary artery spasm, coronary arterial wall stretching or was of non-cardiac origin. As reported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute PTCA Registry, 4.6% of patients after angioplasty have coronary occlusions, 4.8% suffer a myocardial infarction, and 4.2% have coronary spasm. The frequency of chest pain after new device coronary interventions (atherectomy and stenting) seems to be even higher. However, only the minority of patients with post-procedural chest pain have indeed an ischemic event. Therefore, the vast majority of patients have recurrent chest pain without any signs of ischemia. There is some evidence that non-ischemic chest pain after coronary interventions is more common after stent implantation as compared to PTCA (41% vs. 12%). This may be due to the continuous stretching of the arterial wall by the stent as the elastic recoil occurring after PTCA is minimized. In conclusion, chest pain after coronary interventional procedures may potentially be hazardous when due to myocardial ischemia. However, especially after coronary stent placement, cardiologists must consider "stretch pain" due to the overdilation and stretching of the artery caused by the stent in the differential diagnosis. Clinically, it is, therefore, important to recognize that in addition to ischemia-related chest pain other types of chest pain do exist with cardiac origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10372298     DOI: 10.1007/bf03043851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  30 in total

1.  Cardiac pain: anatomic pathways and physiologic mechanisms.

Authors:  J C WHITE
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Frequency and outcome of chest pain after two new coronary interventions (atherectomy and stenting).

Authors:  M Mansour; J P Carrozza; R E Kuntz; R F Fishman; R M Pomerantz; C C Senerchia; R D Safian; D J Diver; D S Baim
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  The elusive link between transient myocardial ischemia and pain.

Authors:  A Malliani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Coronary artery vasoconstriction routinely occurs after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A quantitative arteriographic analysis.

Authors:  T A Fischell; G Derby; T M Tse; M L Stadius
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Myocardial infarction as a complication of new interventional devices.

Authors:  R Waksman; Z M Ghazzal; D S Baim; A R Steenkiste; W Yeh; K M Detre; S B King
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators.

Authors:  D L Fischman; M B Leon; D S Baim; R A Schatz; M P Savage; I Penn; K Detre; L Veltri; D Ricci; M Nobuyoshi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Coronary vasoconstriction after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is attenuated by antiadrenergic agents.

Authors:  L Gregorini; J Fajadet; G Robert; B Cassagneau; M Bernis; J Marco
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Nonischemic chest pain induced by coronary interventions: a prospective study comparing coronary angioplasty and stent implantation.

Authors:  A Jeremias; S Kutscher; M Haude; D Heinen; G Holtmann; W Senf; R Erbel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. The CAVEAT Study Group.

Authors:  E J Topol; F Leya; C A Pinkerton; P L Whitlow; B Hofling; C A Simonton; R R Masden; P W Serruys; M B Leon; D O Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. Initial results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  R A Schatz; D S Baim; M Leon; S G Ellis; S Goldberg; J W Hirshfeld; M W Cleman; H S Cabin; C Walker; J Stagg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Current aspects on differentiating thoracic pain symptoms].

Authors:  R Erbel; F Sonntag
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  The effects of trinitroglycerin injection on early complications of angiography.

Authors:  Ramin Heidari; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Hamid Sanei; Katayuon Rabiei; Mansour Shiri
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2012
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.