Literature DB >> 10370158

Is bone density in the distal femur affected by use of cement and by femoral component design in total knee arthroplasty?

T Seki1, G Omori, Y Koga, Y Suzuki, Y Ishii, H E Takahashi.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in bone density in the distal femur 2 years after total knee arthroplasty with four different implant designs using cemented or cementless femoral components. Bone density was measured retrospectively from radiographs of 114 knees, using a densitometer. A decrease in bone density of up to 57% was identified in the distal femora with a cemented femoral component 2 years after surgery, compared with a decrease of up to 28% with a cementless, porous-coated component of the same design. The differences between the four implant designs in the changes in bone density in the anterior distal femur were significant at 2 years (P < 0.001). A possible cause of this result may be a difference in load transfer due to the different methods of fixation. The surgeon should expect decreased bone density in the distal femur at the time of revision surgery, especially with a cemented femoral component.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10370158     DOI: 10.1007/s007760050091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  12 in total

1.  Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Marco Giorgini; Carla Signorini; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Maria Luisa Brandi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

2.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

3.  DXA evaluation of femoral bone mineral density and cortical width in patients with prior total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Blaty; D Krueger; R Illgen; M Squire; B Heiderscheit; N Binkley; P Anderson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  How to reduce osteopenia in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Claude Schwartz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-16

5.  [Progress of change in bone mineral density after knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Wenxing Wei; Yuangang Wu; Yi Zeng; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 6.  The Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Prosthesis: Indications for Bone Stock and Patellar Morphology.

Authors:  Luigi Molfetta; Andrea Casabella; Augusto Palermo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-24

7.  A cemented mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis prevents peri-prosthetic bone mineral density loss around the femoral component: a consecutive follow-up at a mean of 11 years.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  Modulation and predictors of periprosthetic bone mineral density following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anett Mau-Moeller; Martin Behrens; Sabine Felser; Sven Bruhn; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rainer Bader; Ralf Skripitz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Effect of bisphosphonates on periprosthetic bone loss after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mingmin Shi; Lei Chen; Haobo Wu; Yangxin Wang; Wei Wang; Yujie Zhang; Shigui Yan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The mechanical response of a polyetheretherketone femoral knee implant under a deep squatting loading condition.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Dennis Janssen; Adam Briscoe; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 1.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.