Literature DB >> 10370026

Unsuccessful air-enema reduction of intussusception: is a second attempt worthwhile?

A D Sandler1, S H Ein, B Connolly, A Daneman, R M Filler.   

Abstract

Pneumatic reduction of idiopathic intussusception is successful in about 80% of cases, while 60% of the failures are reduced at surgery without resection. To determine whether delayed, repeated attempts at enema reduction of failures would reduce the need for operation in selected cases, over a 2-year period (1994-1996 inclusive), 17 infants with idiopathic intussusception underwent delayed repeat enemas 2-19 h following the first failed attempt at reduction. Clinical parameters and radiologic findings were evaluated with respect to outcome. Ten intussusceptions were successfully reduced after the second attempt in 9 and after the fourth attempt in 1. Seven children underwent a laparotomy, 5 because of failure of progressive reduction at air enema (AE). Two were taken to surgery early in the series, 1 because of perforation during a second attempt and 1 while awaiting a third reduction attempt. The 10 successful reductions all showed progressive movement of the intussusceptum on each AE; the 2 who perforated failed to show progressive reduction on their second AE. Because of these cases, the remaining 5 were referred to surgery because of failure of progressive reduction of the intussusceptum on the second attempt. At laparotomy, of the 7 unsuccessful reductions, 4 required resection and 3 had difficult manual reduction. The presence of vomiting, a mass, and/or bloody stools were not predictors of outcome. Failures had higher body temperatures (38.1 +/- 0.3 vs 37.4 +/- 0.1 degrees C, P = 0.07), heart rates (153.7 +/- 8 vs 136.9 +/- 2.1 min, P = 0.03), and longer duration of symptoms (36.8 +/- 4 vs 21.3 +/- 3.6 h; P = 0.01) than successes. Delayed repeat AEs may be safe and effective in selected cases of idiopathic intussusception, but should be considered only if significant movement of the intussusceptum is noted at each attempt. The ideal time for repeat AE reduction prior to surgery is not established, but 2-4 h appears appropriate. Pyrexia, tachycardia, and duration of symptoms greater than 36 h are relative contraindications to this course of management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10370026     DOI: 10.1007/s003830050558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  11 in total

Review 1.  Intussusception in children: evidence-based diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

2.  Pediatric ileocolic intussusception: new observations and unexpected implications.

Authors:  Larry A Binkovitz; Amy B Kolbe; Robert C Orth; Nadia F Mahood; Prabin Thapa; Nathan C Hull; Paul G Thacker; Christopher Moir
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-09-19

3.  Air encircling the intussusceptum on air enema for intussusception reduction: an indication for surgery?

Authors:  B Z Koplewitz; N Simanovsky; P D Lebensart; R Udassin; K Abu-Dalu; D Arbell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Management for intussusception in children.

Authors:  Steven Gluckman; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Angela C Webster; Richard G McGee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Air enema for intussusception: is predicting the outcome important?

Authors:  P Ramachandran; A Gupta; P Vincent; S Sridharan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 6.  Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management.

Authors:  Alan Daneman; Oscar Navarro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-11-21

7.  Intussusception in children--clinical presentation, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Thomas Lehnert; Ina Sorge; Holger Till; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Computed tomography findings of unanticipated prolonged ileocolic intussusception in children.

Authors:  Devin Puapong; Steven L Lee; Gary Radner; Peter I Tsai; Douglas S Katz; Maher A Abbas; Harry Applebaum
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

9.  PNEUMATIC REDUCTION OF INTUSSUSCEPTION IN CHILDREN: EXPERIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF OUTCOME AT JUTH, JOS, A TERTIARY HEALTH CENTRE IN NORTH CENTRAL NIGERIA.

Authors:  E D Dung; A H Shitta; B T Alayande; T M Patrick; B Kagoro; N Odunze; C Rikin; L B Chirdan
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; L Grier Arthur; Regan F Williams; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Alana L Beres; Yue-Yung Hu; Elizabeth J Renaud; Robert Ricca; Mark B Slidell; Amy Taylor; Caitlin A Smith; Doug Miniati; Juan E Sola; Patricia Valusek; Loren Berman; Mehul V Raval; Ankush Gosain; Matthew B Dellinger; Stig Sømme; Cynthia D Downard; Jarod P McAteer; Akemi Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.